Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Baluswamy

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 25, 1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/810135

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Baluswamy

Legal References

Reported In
(1970)1MLJ228

Excerpt

- ordern. krishnaswamy reddy, j.1. this is a reference by the district magistrate, ramanathapuram, under section 438, criminal procedure code, for setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed under section 279, indian penal code, by the sub-magistrate, srivilliputhur, in c.c. no. 4309 of 1968, on the ground that the sentence under section 279, indian penal code, cannot be sustained by virtue of section 71, indian penal code, as the accused has been convicted under section 338, indian penal code.2. this reference is quite unwarranted. section 279 and section 338, indian penal code, deal with separate and distinct offences. the gravamen of the charge under section 279, indian penal code, is rash and negligent driving on a public way, whereas the gravamen of the charge under section 338, indian penal code, is. causing grievous hurt by rash and negligent driving in any place. therefore, a person can be convicted for causing grievous hurt by rash and negligent driving and punished under section 338, indian penal code, and at the same time for rash and negilgent driving on a public place, he can also be separately punished under section 279, indian penal code. there is no illegality in the conviction and. sentence passed by the magistrate.3. this reference is rejected.

Full Judgment

ORDER

N. Krishnaswamy Reddy, J.

1. This is a reference by the District Magistrate, Ramanathapuram, under Section 438, Criminal Procedure Code, for setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed under Section 279, Indian Penal Code, by the Sub-Magistrate, Srivilliputhur, in C.C. No. 4309 of 1968, on the ground that the sentence under Section 279, Indian Penal Code, cannot be sustained by virtue of Section 71, Indian Penal Code, as the accused has been convicted under Section 338, Indian Penal Code.

2. This reference is quite unwarranted. Section 279 and Section 338, Indian Penal Code, deal with separate and distinct offences. The gravamen of the charge under Section 279, Indian Penal Code, is rash and negligent driving on a Public way, whereas the gravamen of the charge under Section 338, Indian Penal Code, is. causing grievous hurt by rash and negligent driving in any place. Therefore, a person can be convicted for causing grievous hurt by rash and negligent driving and punished under Section 338, Indian Penal Code, and at the same time for rash and negilgent driving on a public place, he can also be separately punished under Section 279, Indian Penal Code. There is no illegality in the conviction and. sentence passed by the Magistrate.

3. This reference is rejected.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial