Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.P.P. Mohammad Kunhi Vs. P.C.V. Packrichi Umma and ors.

P.P.P. Mohammad Kunhi;p.P.P. Aseema and anr. vs P.C.V. Packrichi Umma and ors.;p.P. Kunhi Kalandathi and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 21, 1923
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/809791

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Custom - Marumakkattayam Mappillas of North Malabar--Tarwads managed exclusively by females--Males, right of, to participate in income and management. -

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.P.P. Mohammad Kunhi;p.P.P. Aseema and anr.

Respondent

P.C.V. Packrichi Umma and ors.;p.P. Kunhi Kalandathi and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
72Ind.Cas.671

Excerpt

custom - marumakkattayam mappillas of north malabar--tarwads managed exclusively by females--males, right of, to participate in income and management. - 1. in calling upon the district judge to record evidence of a custom or usage prevailing in malabar of males being excluded from tarwads or tavazhis managed exclusively by females of certain marumakkattayam mappillas, we discussed in some detail all the decisions in which such a custom might be said to have been judicially recognised or its recognition refused, and we stated that we regarded them as inconclusive. the district judge was, therefore, asked to return a finding on such evidence as might be produced before him to prove the existence of the particular custom in question. this he has done, and we agree with him in holding that it is wholly inadequate to prove the prevalence of any custom by which males are treated as having no right to be consulted in the management of the affairs of the tarwad or tavazhi and no right to participate in the income of the tarwad or tavazhi properties. it is not necessary to express any opinion as to the existence of tarwads in which the manager or karnavathi is a female.2. we, therefore, answer the reference made to us in the affirmative.

Full Judgment

1. In calling upon the District Judge to record evidence of a custom or usage prevailing in Malabar of males being excluded from tarwads or tavazhis managed exclusively by females of certain Marumakkattayam Mappillas, we discussed in some detail all the decisions in which such a custom might be said to have been judicially recognised or its recognition refused, and we stated that we regarded them as inconclusive. The District Judge was, therefore, asked to return a finding on such evidence as might be produced before him to prove the existence of the particular custom in question. This he has done, and we agree with him in holding that it is wholly inadequate to prove the prevalence of any custom by which males are treated as having no right to be consulted in the management of the affairs of the tarwad or tavazhi and no right to participate in the income of the tarwad or tavazhi properties. It is not necessary to express any opinion as to the existence of tarwads in which the manager or karnavathi is a female.

2. We, therefore, answer the Reference made to us in the affirmative.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial