Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Rm.P.M. Ranganathan Chettiar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Dec 16, 1959
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/809735

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Rm.P.M. Ranganathan Chettiar

Legal References

Reported In
(1960)1MLJ330

Excerpt

- orderramachandra iyer, j.1. in my opinion the remedy of the appellant is only to file an appeal against the decree on the terms of which he says he has got a grievance. clause (2) of the decree cannot be construed as a mere order postponing execution. civil revision petition cannot be entertained.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Ramachandra Iyer, J.

1. In my opinion the remedy of the appellant is only to file an appeal against the decree on the terms of which he says he has got a grievance. Clause (2) of the decree cannot be construed as a mere order postponing execution. Civil Revision Petition cannot be entertained.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial