Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Muthu Goundan and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 15, 1939
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/809496

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Muthu Goundan and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1940Mad216; 87Ind.Cas.418

Excerpt

- orderlakshmana rao, j.1. the cart-track in question lies in the patta land of the petitioners, who claim a right to close it, and the proper course would be to proceed against them under section 133, criminal p.c. the conviction of the petitioners under section 283, i.p.c., is therefore set aside and the fines if levied will be refunded.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The cart-track in question lies in the patta land of the petitioners, who claim a right to close it, and the proper course would be to proceed against them under Section 133, Criminal P.C. The conviction of the petitioners under Section 283, I.P.C., is therefore set aside and the fines if levied will be refunded.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial