Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Clifton Vs. Sheldon

Clifton vs Sheldon

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1859
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/80948

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
64 U.S. 481
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Clifton

Respondent

Sheldon

Excerpt

.....and the latter only appealed to this court, the appeal must be dismissed, as the amount in controversy is less than $2,000. the rights of the two were distinct and independent, but if the freight be considered a joint matter, both should have joined in the appeal. the facts are stated in the opinion of the court. page 64 u. s. 483 mr. justice nelson delivered the opinion of the court. a motion has been made, on the part of the appellee, to dismiss the appeal, for the want of jurisdiction. a libel was filed by clifton in the district court to recover freight on the two hundred and sixty-nine bales of cotton and nine bags of wool. brower and sheldon appeared as claimants and contested the claim for the freight. brower claimed sixty-seven of the two hundred and sixty-nine bales, and sheldon two hundred and two bales. the district court dismissed the libel. on appeal to the circuit court, this decree was reversed and decree rendered in favor of the libellant for the amount of the freight, $2,338.06; that j. w. brower, claimant of a portion of the cotton, pay to the libellant the sum of $583.84, being the freight on the cotton claimed by him in the suit, and that the page 64 u. s. 484 claimant, w. h. sheldon, pay for the portion claimed by him the sum of $1,754.22. sheldon appealed from the decree to this court. the motion is now made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the decree against sheldon is less than $2,000, and which is apparent from a perusal of the decree. the sum decreed against him is only $1,754.22. the freight was separately awarded against the claimants, in proportion to the cotton shipped by each one. the rights of each were distinct and independent. but if it were otherwise, and the whole of the freight jointly against the claimants, the appeal must still be dismissed, as then the claimants should have joined in it. motion to dismiss granted.

Full Judgment

Clifton v. Sheldon - 64 U.S. 481 (1859)
U.S. Supreme Court Clifton v. Sheldon, 64 U.S. 23 How. 481 481 (1859)

Clifton v. Sheldon

64 U.S. (23 How.) 481

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SYLLABUS

Where a decree was made by the circuit court, sitting in admiralty, that two persons should pay freight, one in the sum of $583.84, and the other in the sum of $1,754.22, and the latter only appealed to this Court, the appeal must be dismissed, as the amount in controversy is less than $2,000.

The rights of the two were distinct and independent, but if the freight be considered a joint matter, both should have joined in the appeal.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 64 U. S. 483

MR. JUSTICE NELSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

A motion has been made, on the part of the appellee, to dismiss the appeal, for the want of jurisdiction.

A libel was filed by Clifton in the district court to recover freight on the two hundred and sixty-nine bales of cotton and nine bags of wool. Brower and Sheldon appeared as claimants and contested the claim for the freight. Brower claimed sixty-seven of the two hundred and sixty-nine bales, and Sheldon two hundred and two bales. The district court dismissed the libel.

On appeal to the circuit court, this decree was reversed and decree rendered in favor of the libellant for the amount of the freight, $2,338.06; that J. W. Brower, claimant of a portion of the cotton, pay to the libellant the sum of $583.84, being the freight on the cotton claimed by him in the suit, and that the

Page 64 U. S. 484

claimant, W. H. Sheldon, pay for the portion claimed by him the sum of $1,754.22. Sheldon appealed from the decree to this Court.

The motion is now made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the decree against Sheldon is less than $2,000, and which is apparent from a perusal of the decree. The sum decreed against him is only $1,754.22.

The freight was separately awarded against the claimants, in proportion to the cotton shipped by each one. The rights of each were distinct and independent.

But if it were otherwise, and the whole of the freight jointly against the claimants, the appeal must still be dismissed, as then the claimants should have joined in it.

Motion to dismiss granted.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial