Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Thirumal Reddy

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 27, 1922
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/809405

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 106(3) - Absence of finding as to breach of peace--Appellate Court, whether may demand security. -

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Thirumal Reddy

Legal References

Cases Referred
Muthiah Chetli v. Emperor
Reported In
AIR1923Mad133; 76Ind.Cas.966

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 106(3) - absence of finding as to breach of peace--appellate court, whether may demand security. - 1. there is no finding that any branch of peace occurred. following muthiah chetli v. emperor 29 m. 190 : 3 cr. l.j. 461 which has not been overruled so far as this part of the case is concerned by the case of in re soldi gounden 21 ind. cas. 174 : 37 m. 153 : 14 m.l.t. 235 : (1913) m.w.n. 769 : 25 m.l.j. 403 : 14 cri. l.j. 574. i am of opinion that the appellate court was wrong in directing the accused to enter into a bond under section 106 of the code of criminal procedure.2. the order under section 106 is set aside.

Full Judgment

1. There is no finding that any branch of peace occurred. following Muthiah Chetli v. Emperor 29 M. 190 : 3 Cr. L.J. 461 which has not been overruled so far as this part of the case is concerned by the case of In re Soldi Gounden 21 Ind. Cas. 174 : 37 M. 153 : 14 M.L.T. 235 : (1913) M.W.N. 769 : 25 M.L.J. 403 : 14 Cri. L.J. 574. I am of opinion that the Appellate Court was wrong in directing the accused to enter into a bond under Section 106 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The order under Section 106 is set aside.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: Thirumal Reddy vs Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Kumaraswami Sastriar, J.
Land Acquisition

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales