Verden Vs. Coleman

Verden vs Coleman

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1859

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/80865

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/80865
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1859
Case Number: 63 U.S. 192
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Verden

Respondent

Coleman

Excerpt

..... coleman sued verden in a state court of indiana on a note of hand, and a mortgage of lands to secure its payment. on various pleadings and proofs, the cause was submitted for judgment to the court, the parties having dispensed with a jury. judgment was rendered against verden, who appealed to the supreme court of indiana. there, the judgment of the circuit was affirmed. this occurred on the 26th day of june, 1858. and then we find the following entry of record: "and afterwards, to-wit, at a court began and held on the 24th of may, 1858, and continued from day to day till july 16th, 1858, at which time come the appellant, by hon d. mace, his attorney, and prays an appeal to the united states supreme court, which prayer is granted. " page 63 u. s. 193 bond was given to prosecute the appeal, and the clerk certifies the record to be a true copy of the proceedings. no appeal can be taken from the final decision of a state court of last resort, under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act, to the supreme court of the united states. a writ of error alone can bring up the cause. we refer to the appendix of curtis' digest for the mode. it is ordered that the case be dismissed.

Full Judgment

Verden v. Coleman - 63 U.S. 192 (1859)
U.S. Supreme Court Verden v. Coleman, 63 U.S. 22 How. 192 192 (1859)

Verden v. Coleman

63 U.S. (22 How.) 192

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF INDIANA

SYLLABUS

No appeal can be taken from the final decision of a state court of last resort under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, to the Supreme Court of the United States. A writ of error alone can bring up the cause.

This was a case of foreclosure of a mortgage brought in the Benton Circuit Court (state court). In the progress of the trial, there was a bill of exceptions signed and sealed by the presiding judge, and the case then carried up by appeal to the supreme court of the state. That court affirmed the judgment of the court below, upon which an appeal was prayed to the United States Supreme Court, which prayer was granted. The appeal bond recited that Samuel Verden hath "prosecuted a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United states," &c.;, but no writ of error was sued out.

It is not necessary to notice the nature of the case any further.

MR. JUSTICE CATRON delivered the opinion of the Court.

Coleman sued Verden in a state court of Indiana on a note of hand, and a mortgage of lands to secure its payment. On various pleadings and proofs, the cause was submitted for judgment to the court, the parties having dispensed with a jury. Judgment was rendered against Verden, who appealed to the Supreme Court of Indiana. There, the judgment of the circuit was affirmed.

This occurred on the 26th day of June, 1858. And then we find the following entry of record:

"And afterwards, to-wit, at a court began and held on the 24th of May, 1858, and continued from day to day till July 16th, 1858, at which time come the appellant, by Hon D. Mace, his attorney, and prays an appeal to the United States supreme court, which prayer is granted. "

Page 63 U. S. 193

Bond was given to prosecute the appeal, and the clerk certifies the record to be a true copy of the proceedings.

No appeal can be taken from the final decision of a state court of last resort, under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act, to the Supreme Court of the United States. A writ of error alone can bring up the cause. We refer to the appendix of Curtis' Digest for the mode.

It is ordered that the case be dismissed.

Same Parties Verden vs Coleman Same Subject Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition court of last resort bill of exceptions final decision circuit court supreme court