Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: S.J. Nathan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 10, 1957
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/808636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: S.J. Nathan

Legal References

Reported In
(1958)1MLJ9

Excerpt

- order1. there is no doubt whatever that this appeal ought to have been filed in the court of the principal judge of the city civil court. it was wrongly filed here though in bona fide error. it will be returned for presentation to the proper court. the appellant can file a petition in that court to excuse the delay in the peculiar circumstances. it is a fit case to excuse the delay. return the papers at once.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. There is no doubt whatever that this appeal ought to have been filed in the Court of the Principal Judge of the City Civil Court. It was wrongly filed here though in bona fide error. It will be returned for presentation to the proper Court. The Appellant can file a petition in that Court to excuse the delay in the peculiar circumstances. It is a fit case to excuse the delay. Return the papers at once.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: S.J. Nathan vs Same Subject Civil
Civil

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales