Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Overton Vs. Cheek

Overton vs Cheek

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1859
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/80847

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
63 U.S. 46
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Overton

Respondent

Cheek

Excerpt

overton v. cheek - 63 u.s. 46 (1859) u.s. supreme court overton v. cheek, 63 u.s. 22 how. 46 46 (1859) overton v. cheek 63 u.s. (22 how.) 46 error to the circuit court of the united states for the district of west tennessee syllabus where a writ of error was allowed in open court in the circuit court, but this writ had no seal and was not returned to this court with the transcript of the record, and two terms afterwards a paper was filed in the clerk's office, in form of a writ of error, but without a seal, and having no authenticated transcript annexed, the cause must be dismissed on motion. page 63 u. s. 47 mr. justice mc lean delivered the opinion of the court. by reference to the transcript, it appears that the judgment of the circuit court was rendered the sixteenth of april, 1857. at the ensuing term of the supreme court, the transcript was filed. it appears that a writ of error in the circuit court was allowed, in open court, and signed by the clerk the seventeenth day of april, 1857, which was returnable to the supreme court on the first monday of december, 1857. but this writ had no seal, nor was it returned with the transcript to the page 63 u. s. 48 supreme court. but on the twenty-seventh of december, 1859, a paper was filed in the clerk's office, in form of a writ of error, but without a seal, and having no authenticated transcript annexed. from this it appears that no writ of error has been certified with the transcript, and that the paper purporting to be a writ of error, which was filed in december last, being without seal, was void. two terms of this court have intervened, not including the present term, since the transcript was certified, without a writ of error. the cause must therefore be dismissed for these irregularities, without noticing others apparent on the record.

Full Judgment

Overton v. Cheek - 63 U.S. 46 (1859)
U.S. Supreme Court Overton v. Cheek, 63 U.S. 22 How. 46 46 (1859)

Overton v. Cheek

63 U.S. (22 How.) 46

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST TENNESSEE

SYLLABUS

Where a writ of error was allowed in open court in the circuit court, but this writ had no seal and was not returned to this Court with the transcript of the record, and two terms afterwards a paper was filed in the clerk's office, in form of a writ of error, but without a seal, and having no authenticated transcript annexed, the cause must be dismissed on motion.

Page 63 U. S. 47

MR. JUSTICE Mc LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

By reference to the transcript, it appears that the judgment of the circuit court was rendered the sixteenth of April, 1857. At the ensuing term of the Supreme Court, the transcript was filed.

It appears that a writ of error in the circuit court was allowed, in open court, and signed by the clerk the seventeenth day of April, 1857, which was returnable to the Supreme Court on the first Monday of December, 1857. But this writ had no seal, nor was it returned with the transcript to the

Page 63 U. S. 48

Supreme Court. But on the twenty-seventh of December, 1859, a paper was filed in the clerk's office, in form of a writ of error, but without a seal, and having no authenticated transcript annexed.

From this it appears that no writ of error has been certified with the transcript, and that the paper purporting to be a writ of error, which was filed in December last, being without seal, was void. Two terms of this Court have intervened, not including the present term, since the transcript was certified, without a writ of error.

The cause must therefore be dismissed for these irregularities, without noticing others apparent on the record.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial