Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Crown Prosecutor Vs. Subraya Naicker

The Crown Prosecutor vs Subraya Naicker

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 23, 1912
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/808044

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Municipal Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Madras City Municipal Act, (III of 1904), Sections 150, 188 - failure to pay tats within time prescribed after service of bill--Omission to appeal to Standing Committee--Prosecution--Right of accused to plead non-liability for tax. -

Key legal issue
Municipal Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Crown Prosecutor

Respondent

Subraya Naicker

Legal References

Reported In
14Ind.Cas.207

Excerpt

madras city municipal act, (iii of 1904), sections 150, 188 - failure to pay tats within time prescribed after service of bill--omission to appeal to standing committee--prosecution--right of accused to plead non-liability for tax. - order1. this case is governed by the decision in veeraraghavulu v. president corporation of madras 34 m.k 130 : 7 ind. cas. 743 : 8 m.l.t. 305 : 20 m.l.j. 773. we set aside the order of acquittal and direct the presidency magistrate to re-try the case and dispose of it in accordance with law.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. This case is governed by the decision in Veeraraghavulu V. President Corporation of Madras 34 M.k 130 : 7 Ind. Cas. 743 : 8 M.L.T. 305 : 20 M.L.J. 773. We set aside the order of acquittal and direct the Presidency Magistrate to re-try the case and dispose of it in accordance with law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial