Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Kambala Narayana

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 24, 1919
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/807735

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 269(3), 307, 309 - Joint trial for offences triable by Jury and with aid of assessors--Court disagreeing with Jury--Reference to High Court without securing opinion of assessors in case triable with aid of assessors--Procedure. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Kambala Narayana

Legal References

Reported In
50Ind.Cas.832

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 269(3), 307, 309 - joint trial for offences triable by jury and with aid of assessors--court disagreeing with jury--reference to high court without securing opinion of assessors in case triable with aid of assessors--procedure. - 1. it does not appear that the sessions judge has followed the directions contained in section 309 of the criminal procedure code which require him to give judgment after recording the opinion of the assessors, to convict if be finds the accused guilty and to pass sentence according to law.2. the circumstances that in this case the accused is charged in the same trial with another offence triable by jury section 269, clause (3), of the code of criminal procedure, that the judge disagrees with the verdict of the jury on that charge and desires to make a reference under section 307 of the criminal procedure code, do not, in our opinion, absolve the sessions judge from complying with the requirements of section 309, as regards the offence tried by him with assessors.2. the reference is, therefore, premature and we shall send back the case to the learned sessions judge to rectify the irregularity and then act according to law.

Full Judgment

1. It does not appear that the Sessions Judge has followed the directions contained in Section 309 of the Criminal Procedure Code which require him to give judgment after recording the opinion of the assessors, to convict if be finds the accused guilty and to pass sentence according to law.

2. The circumstances that in this case the accused is charged in the same trial with another offence triable by Jury Section 269, Clause (3), of the Code of Criminal Procedure, that the Judge disagrees with the verdict of the Jury on that charge and desires to make a reference under Section 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code, do not, in our opinion, absolve the Sessions Judge from complying with the requirements of Section 309, as regards the offence tried by him with assessors.

2. The reference is, therefore, premature and we shall send back the case to the learned Sessions Judge to rectify the irregularity and then act according to law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial