Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Oomayan Alias Baluchamy

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided May 01, 1959
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/806613

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Oomayan Alias Baluchamy

Legal References

Reported In
(1960)1MLJ83

Excerpt

- ordersomasundaram, j.1. this is a reference under section 341 of the code of criminal procedure. the accused is charged under section 201 read with section 302, indian penal code. the magistrate has committed the accused to sessions. in paragraph 2 of his letter of reference the magistrate states:oomayan alias baluchamy accused in this case is completely deaf and dumb and unable to understand the proceedings. therefore, sri williams, the headmaster, municipal deaf and dumb school, karaikudi, was engaged and the proceedings of the court were explained to the accused by signs as required under section 361, criminal procedure code and the accused understood the proceedings.2. to begin with, section 361 cannot apply to this case, because under that section whenever any evidence is given in a language not understood by the accused, it should be interpreted to him in open court in a language understood by him. a deaf and dumb man can understand by signs and gestures. signs and gestures do not form a language, though loosely it may be called the language of the deaf and dumb. but that is not meant by section 361. section 361 therefore does not apply.3. in the earlier portion of paragraph 2 of his letter the magistrate finds that the accused is completely deaf and dumb and unable to understand the proceedings. subsequently, in the same paragraph he says that the accused understood the proceedings. section 341 says:if the accused, though not insane, cannot be made to understand the proceedings, the court may proceed with the enquiry....4. but in this case the magistrate himself finds that the accused understood the proceedings. i am unable to see how this reference lies to this court. the reference is therefore returned. it is for the sessions judge to whom the case has been committed to consider whether this is a case for reference under section 341, criminal procedure code.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Somasundaram, J.

1. This is a reference under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused is charged under Section 201 read with Section 302, Indian Penal Code. The Magistrate has committed the accused to Sessions. In paragraph 2 of his letter of reference the Magistrate states:

Oomayan alias Baluchamy accused in this case is completely deaf and dumb and unable to understand the proceedings. Therefore, Sri Williams, the Headmaster, Municipal Deaf and Dumb School, Karaikudi, was engaged and the proceedings of the Court were explained to the accused by signs as required under Section 361, Criminal Procedure Code and the accused understood the proceedings.

2. To begin with, Section 361 cannot apply to this case, because under that section whenever any evidence is given in a language not understood by the accused, it should be interpreted to him in open Court in a language understood by him. A deaf and dumb man can understand by signs and gestures. Signs and gestures do not form a language, though loosely it may be called the language of the deaf and dumb. But that is not meant by Section 361. Section 361 therefore does not apply.

3. In the earlier portion of paragraph 2 of his letter the Magistrate finds that the accused is completely deaf and dumb and unable to understand the proceedings. Subsequently, in the same paragraph he says that the accused understood the proceedings. Section 341 says:

If the accused, though not insane, cannot be made to understand the proceedings, the Court may proceed with the enquiry....

4. But in this case the Magistrate himself finds that the accused understood the proceedings. I am unable to see how this reference lies to this Court. The reference is therefore returned. It is for the Sessions Judge to whom the case has been committed to consider whether this is a case for reference under Section 341, Criminal Procedure Code.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial