Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Narayanaswami Iyer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 06, 1912
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/806315

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of (sic)), Section 193 - Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Sections 63 and 82(a)--Registrar, false statement before, whether punishable. - - 686 seems to me to be clearly distinguishable from the present case.

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Narayanaswami Iyer

Legal References

Cases Referred
Empress v. Bubaji Raghunath
Reported In
18Ind.Cas.662

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of (sic)), section 193 - registration act (xvi of 1908), sections 63 and 82(a)--registrar, false statement before, whether punishable. - - 686 seems to me to be clearly distinguishable from the present case.orderralph benson, o.c.j.1. under section 63 of the registration act, 1908, the sub-registrar had authority to administer an oath to the petitioner and to record a note of the substance of the statement made by the petitioner before him.2. section 82(a) enacts that 'whoever intentionally makes any false statement...before any officer acting in execution of this act in any proceeding or inquiry under this act', shall be punishable and so forth. it seems to me clear that the petitioner has committed an offence punishable under section 82(a) of the registration act and under section 113, indian penal code.3. the case referred to queen-empress v. bubaji raghunath 1 bom. l.r. 686 seems to me to be clearly distinguishable from the present case. as i understand the facts in that case, the registrar, before he made the inquiry under section 74 of the act, had before him admissions of execution by the executants and there was, therefore, no ground for his making an inquiry under section 74.4. i see no ground for revision and i dismiss the petition.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Ralph Benson, O.C.J.

1. Under Section 63 of the Registration Act, 1908, the Sub-Registrar had authority to administer an oath to the petitioner and to record a note of the substance of the statement made by the petitioner before him.

2. Section 82(a) enacts that 'whoever intentionally makes any false statement...before any officer acting in execution of this Act in any proceeding or inquiry under this Act', shall be punishable and so forth. It seems to me clear that the petitioner has committed an offence punishable under Section 82(a) of the Registration Act and under Section 113, Indian Penal Code.

3. The case referred to Queen-Empress v. Bubaji Raghunath 1 Bom. L.R. 686 seems to me to be clearly distinguishable from the present case. As I understand the facts in that case, the Registrar, before he made the inquiry under Section 74 of the Act, had before him admissions of execution by the executants and there was, therefore, no ground for his making an inquiry under Section 74.

4. I see no ground for revision and I dismiss the petition.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial