Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Marana Goundan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Dec 17, 1940
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/804220

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Marana Goundan

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1941Mad560; (1941)1MLJ364

Excerpt

- lakshmana rao, j.1. the appellant has been convicted under section 304 (2) of the indian penal code for causing the death of one karuppa chuckli by kicking him on the abdomen and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 7 years.2. the deceased owed one anna to the appellant and the latter demanded repayment. the deceased promised to pay later and the appellant, is stated to have kicked him twice on the abdomen remarking 'how long am i to wait'. the deceased collapsed and died soon after.3. the cause of death was shock due to the kicking and p. w. 7 a disinterested witness not to mention p. w. 4 the widow speak to the alleged kicking. p. w. 5 was informed about it soon after, and the story of the appellant that he merely pushed the deceased and went away is incredible. but there was no mark of injury external or internal, and it is difficult to hold that the appellant intended or knew that by kicking on the abdomen as he did he was likely to endanger life. the conviction under section 304 (2), indian penal code, is therefore unsustainable and as rightly conceded the conviction can only be under section 323, indian penal code. the conviction of the appellant is therefore altered to one under section 323, indian penal code and he is sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year.

Full Judgment

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The appellant has been convicted under Section 304 (2) of the Indian Penal Code for causing the death of one Karuppa Chuckli by kicking him on the abdomen and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 7 years.

2. The deceased owed one anna to the appellant and the latter demanded repayment. The deceased promised to pay later and the appellant, is stated to have kicked him twice on the abdomen remarking 'How long am I to wait'. The deceased collapsed and died soon after.

3. The cause of death was shock due to the kicking and P. W. 7 a disinterested witness not to mention P. W. 4 the widow speak to the alleged kicking. P. W. 5 was informed about it soon after, and the story of the appellant that he merely pushed the deceased and went away is incredible. But there was no mark of injury external or internal, and it is difficult to hold that the appellant intended or knew that by kicking on the abdomen as he did he was likely to endanger life. The conviction under Section 304 (2), Indian Penal Code, is therefore unsustainable and as rightly conceded the conviction can only be under Section 323, Indian Penal Code. The conviction of the appellant is therefore altered to one under Section 323, Indian Penal Code and he is sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial