Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Sangili Velan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 02, 1943
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/803868

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Criminhal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminhal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Sangili Velan

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1944Mad498

Excerpt

- orderkuppuswami ayyar, j.1. this is a reference by the learned sessions judge of trichinopoly with regard to the commitment of the accused in c. c. no. 526 of 1943 on the file of the stationary sub-magistrate of lalgudi. the accused in that case was charged with having committed theft. the magistrate tried him as in a war-rant case, found him guilty, convicted him of the offence of theft, and as he was an old offender he committed the accused to sessions. it is pointed out by the learned sessions judge that after having found him guilty, he ought not to have committed the accused to the sessions court. it was open to him to send the papers to a first class magistrate] for passing an enhanced sentence in view of the fact that the accused was an old offender. instead of doing so he committed him to sessions. this is irregular, especially as the provisions relating to the enquiry into offences as laid down under chap. 18, criminal p.c., had not been followed. the conviction and sentence are therefore set aside and the case remanded to the file of the stationary sub-magistrate of lalgudi for being dealt with according to law.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Kuppuswami Ayyar, J.

1. This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Trichinopoly with regard to the commitment of the accused in C. c. No. 526 of 1943 on the file of the Stationary Sub-Magistrate of Lalgudi. The accused in that case was charged with having committed theft. The Magistrate tried him as in a war-rant case, found him guilty, convicted him of the offence of theft, and as he was an old offender he committed the accused to sessions. It is pointed out by the learned Sessions Judge that after having found him guilty, he ought not to have committed the accused to the Sessions Court. It was open to him to send the papers to a First Class Magistrate] for passing an enhanced sentence in view of the fact that the accused was an old offender. Instead of doing so he committed him to sessions. This is irregular, especially as the provisions relating to the enquiry into offences as laid down under Chap. 18, Criminal P.C., had not been followed. The conviction and sentence are therefore set aside and the case remanded to the file of the Stationary Sub-Magistrate of Lalgudi for being dealt with according to law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial