Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Arumugam Pillai

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Dec 04, 1922
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/803225

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 476 - Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Sections 193, 196--Sanction for prosecution--Proceedings after ex parte decree set aside, whether continuation of earlier proceedings--False statement made before ex parte decree. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Arumugam Pillai

Legal References

Cases Referred
Aiyakannu Pillai v. Emperor
Reported In
81Ind.Cas.219

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 476 - penal code (act xlv of 1860), sections 193, 196--sanction for prosecution--proceedings after ex parte decree set aside, whether continuation of earlier proceedings--false statement made before ex parte decree. - spencer, j.1. the trial of original suit no. 88 of 1920 after the ex parte decree against the defendant was set aside may be regarded as the continuation of the trial of the same suit which first ended in a decree for the plaintiff.2. the definition of 'judicial proceeding' in section 4 (m), criminal procedure code, is not opposed to this view.3. at the time of dismissing the suit, the district munsif commenced to take action under section 476, criminal procedure code, by issuing notice to the petitioner to show cause against an order being passed under that section. therefore, the decisions in aiyakannu pillai v. emperor 1 ind cas. 597 : 32 m. 49 : 19 m.l.j. 42 : 4 m.l.t. 404 : 9 cr. l.j. 41 and in re padmabha liebbara 50 ind. cas. 485 : 42 m. 422 : 9 l.w. 315 : 36 m.l.j. 352 : 25 m.l.t. 296; (1919) m.w.n. 223 : 20 cr. l.j. 309 are not applicable to the facts of this case. whether the petitioner's acts amount to offences under sections 209 and 210, indian penal code, is not of consequence in these proceedings. it is sufficient, that as a witness he is liable to be tried for offences under sections 193 and 196 of the indian penal code, for which sanction has been accorded.4. the petition is dismissed.

Full Judgment

Spencer, J.

1. The trial of Original Suit No. 88 of 1920 after the ex parte decree against the defendant was set aside may be regarded as the continuation of the trial of the same suit which first ended in a decree for the plaintiff.

2. The definition of 'judicial proceeding' in Section 4 (m), Criminal Procedure Code, is not opposed to this view.

3. At the time of dismissing the suit, the District Munsif commenced to take action under Section 476, Criminal Procedure Code, by issuing notice to the petitioner to show cause against an order being passed under that section. Therefore, the decisions in Aiyakannu Pillai v. Emperor 1 Ind Cas. 597 : 32 M. 49 : 19 M.L.J. 42 : 4 M.L.T. 404 : 9 Cr. L.J. 41 and In re Padmabha liebbara 50 Ind. Cas. 485 : 42 M. 422 : 9 L.W. 315 : 36 M.L.J. 352 : 25 M.L.T. 296; (1919) M.W.N. 223 : 20 Cr. L.J. 309 are not applicable to the facts of this case. Whether the petitioner's acts amount to offences under Sections 209 and 210, Indian Penal Code, is not of consequence in these proceedings. It is sufficient, that as a witness he is liable to be tried for offences under Sections 193 and 196 of the Indian Penal Code, for which sanction has been accorded.

4. The petition is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial