Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Boyd Vs. Scott

Boyd vs Scott

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1850
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/80228

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
52 U.S. 292
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Boyd

Respondent

Scott

Excerpt

.....next term of the supreme court of the united page 52 u.s. 292, 293 states, and on the day last aforesaid entered into bond in the penalty of one thousand dollars with silas parsons his security, payable to the said william scott and william greene, conditioned that, if the said early boyd should prosecute the said writ of error to effect, and should also pay and satisfy the judgment which shall be rendered in said cause by the supreme court of the united states, then the said obligation should be void, else remain in full force and virtue. 'in testimony whereof, i hereto subscribe my name and affix the seal of the said district court, at office, in the town of huntsville, in the district aforesaid, this the 24th day of january, a. d. 1851, and of the independence of the united states of america the seventy-fifth. 'b. t. moore, clerk.' moved the court for a rule on the plaintiff in error, to file the record on or before the ___ day of _____, and that on failure the case be dismissed. on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered by the court, that the said motion be, and the same is hereby, overruled. per mr. chief justice taney.

Full Judgment

BOYD v. SCOTT - 52 U.S. 292 (1850)
U.S. Supreme Court BOYD v. SCOTT, 52 U.S. 292 (1850)

52 U.S. 292 (How.)

EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF EARLY BOYD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
WILLIAM SCOTT AND WILLIAM GREENE.-In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama.

December Term, 1850

MR. CRITTENDEN, of counsel for the defendants in error, having filed the following certificate, viz.:--

    'The United States of America, Northern District of Alabama.
    'In the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama, at Huntsville.
    'I, Benjamin T. Moore, Clerk of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama, at Huntsville, do hereby certify, that at the term of the District Court aforesaid, begun and held at the court-house in the town of Huntsville, in said district, on the fourth Monday in November, A. D. 1850, in a certain cause therein pending in said court, wherein Early Boyd was plaintiff, and William Scott and William Greene were defendants, judgment was rendered therein in favor of said defendants against said plaintiff, for the costs of suit, amounting to the sum of _____ dollars, and that from the said judgment the said Early Boyd, on the 29th day of November, A. D. 1850, prayed and obtained a writ of error to the then next term of the Supreme Court of the United

Page 52 U.S. 292, 293

States, and on the day last aforesaid entered into bond in the penalty of one thousand dollars with Silas Parsons his security, payable to the said William Scott and William Greene, conditioned that, if the said Early Boyd should prosecute the said writ of error to effect, and should also pay and satisfy the judgment which shall be rendered in said cause by the Supreme Court of the United States, then the said obligation should be void, else remain in full force and virtue.

    'In testimony whereof, I hereto subscribe my name and affix the seal of the said District Court, at office, in the town of Huntsville, in the District aforesaid, this the 24th day of January, A. D. 1851, and of the independence of the United States of America the seventy-fifth.
    'B. T. MOORE, Clerk.'

moved the court for a rule on the plaintiff in error, to file the record on or before the ___ day of _____, and that on failure the case be dismissed. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered by the court, that the said motion be, and the same is hereby, overruled.

Per MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TANEY.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial