Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Punya Syamalo

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 19, 1923
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/800865

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Local Boards Act (Madras Act XIV of 1920) - Money due under a contract of lease of tolls--Section 221 of the Act, if recoverable under. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Punya Syamalo

Legal References

Reported In
(1924)ILR47Mad381

Excerpt

local boards act (madras act xiv of 1920) - money due under a contract of lease of tolls--section 221 of the act, if recoverable under. - order1. we think the reasons stated in the order of the learned sessions judge are correct and we accept the same. the amount due under a contract of lease though of the toll cannot be treated as falling within the words of section 221 of the local boards act. the words 'other sums' in the section should be read ejusdem generis with what precedes them. then again the sum in question here, is not payable 'under or by virtue of this act,' but is payable under the contract between the parties. section 106 has no bearing on this question; it merely authorizes the leasing out of the tolls but does not make the money payable under the contract of lease, money payable under the act.2. we, therefore, set aside the order of the town sub-magistrate of berhampur in m.c. no. 44 of 1922 as made without jurisdiction.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. We think the reasons stated in the Order of the learned Sessions Judge are correct and we accept the same. The amount due under a contract of lease though of the toll cannot be treated as falling within the words of Section 221 of the Local Boards Act. The words 'other sums' in the section should be read ejusdem generis with what precedes them. Then again the sum in question here, is not payable 'under or by virtue of this Act,' but is payable under the contract between the parties. Section 106 has no bearing on this question; it merely authorizes the leasing out of the tolls but does not make the money payable under the contract of lease, money payable under the Act.

2. We, therefore, set aside the order of the Town Sub-Magistrate of Berhampur in M.C. No. 44 of 1922 as made without jurisdiction.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial