Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Rangasami Pillai

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Dec 04, 1913
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/800856

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 109, 110 - Security for good behaviour under both sections, if legal. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Rangasami Pillai

Legal References

Reported In
(1915)ILR38Mad555; 30Ind.Cas.455

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), sections 109, 110 - security for good behaviour under both sections, if legal. - order1. we do not think that a person should be bound over under both the sections 109 and 110 of the criminal procedure code. see kosa kumaran, in re 30 ind. cas. 450 note. we accordingly set aside the order binding him under section 109. the evidence fully supports the order so far as section 110 is concerned. we leave the order, therefore, to stand as one made under section 110.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. We do not think that a person should be bound over under both the Sections 109 and 110 of the Criminal Procedure Code. See Kosa Kumaran, In re 30 Ind. Cas. 450 note. We accordingly set aside the order binding him under Section 109. The evidence fully supports the order so far as Section 110 is concerned. We leave the order, therefore, to stand as one made under Section 110.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: Rangasami Pillai vs Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Sankaran Nair and; Ayling, JJ.
Criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales