Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Rosario Quadros

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 20, 1913
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/800677

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Labour and Industrial;Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Workman's Breach of Contract Act (XIII of 1859) - Bandsman, if workman. - - 1. A musician in a band is clearly not an artificer or labourer, and is not, I think, a workman within the meaning of the Act (Act XIII of 1859). I agree with the District Magistrate and set aside the order of the Magistrate.

Key legal issue
Labour and Industrial;Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Rosario Quadros

Legal References

Reported In
(1915)ILR38Mad551; 30Ind.Cas.453

Excerpt

workman's breach of contract act (xiii of 1859) - bandsman, if workman. - - 1. a musician in a band is clearly not an artificer or labourer, and is not, i think, a workman within the meaning of the act (act xiii of 1859). i agree with the district magistrate and set aside the order of the magistrate.ordermiller, j.1. a musician in a band is clearly not an artificer or labourer, and is not, i think, a workman within the meaning of the act (act xiii of 1859). i agree with the district magistrate and set aside the order of the magistrate.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Miller, J.

1. A musician in a band is clearly not an artificer or labourer, and is not, I think, a workman within the meaning of the Act (Act XIII of 1859). I agree with the District Magistrate and set aside the order of the Magistrate.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: Rosario Quadros vs Same Subject Labour and Industrial;Criminal Same Judge Miller, J.
Labour and Industrial;Criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales