Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Marimuthu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 19, 1909
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/800309
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Marimuthu

Legal References

Cases Referred
Empress v. Makimuddin
Reported In
1Ind.Cas.807
Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Part of AI Studio: get a comprehensive 18-section AI Brief and case-scoped chat on this judgment, plus Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind from the AI Studio hub.

Log in to unlock AI Studio

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 83 - conviction of a child, between 7 and 12 year--presumption of quit--mal write of understanding. - orderabdur rahim, j.1. the accused in this case is a girl of 10 years and has been convicted by the sub-magistrate of an offence under section 381, indian penal code, with respect to a silver button worth 8 annas belonging to her master, and sentenced to one month's simple imprisonment. under section 83, indian penal code, a child between 7 and 12 years of age cannot be hold guilty of an offence with respect to any act unless it is shown that the child had attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of that act. see queen-empress v. makimuddin 27 c.k 138. the magistrate does not appear to have applied his mind to this question and the fact which transpired upon the evidence, viz., that the girl picked up the button and gave it to her mother does not in itself show that she knew that she was doing anything wrong. further, i must note that the sub-magistrate was not justified in passing a sentence of imprisonment upon the accused even if an offence had been made out. 1 reverse the conviction and sentence, and the accused will be discharged from bail.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Abdur Rahim, J.

1. The accused in this case is a girl of 10 years and has been convicted by the Sub-Magistrate of an offence under Section 381, Indian Penal Code, with respect to a silver button worth 8 annas belonging to her master, and sentenced to one month's simple imprisonment. Under Section 83, Indian Penal Code, a child between 7 and 12 years of age cannot be hold guilty of an offence with respect to any act unless it is shown that the child had attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of that act. See Queen-Empress v. Makimuddin 27 C.k 138. The Magistrate does not appear to have applied his mind to this question and the fact which transpired upon the evidence, viz., that the girl picked up the button and gave it to her mother does not in itself show that she knew that she was doing anything wrong. Further, I must note that the Sub-Magistrate was not justified in passing a sentence of imprisonment upon the accused even if an offence had been made out. 1 reverse the conviction and sentence, and the accused will be discharged from bail.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial