Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Marimuthu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 19, 1909
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/800309

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 83 - Conviction of a child, between 7 and 12 year--Presumption of quit--Mal write of understanding. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Marimuthu

Legal References

Cases Referred
Empress v. Makimuddin
Reported In
1Ind.Cas.807

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 83 - conviction of a child, between 7 and 12 year--presumption of quit--mal write of understanding. - orderabdur rahim, j.1. the accused in this case is a girl of 10 years and has been convicted by the sub-magistrate of an offence under section 381, indian penal code, with respect to a silver button worth 8 annas belonging to her master, and sentenced to one month's simple imprisonment. under section 83, indian penal code, a child between 7 and 12 years of age cannot be hold guilty of an offence with respect to any act unless it is shown that the child had attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of that act. see queen-empress v. makimuddin 27 c.k 138. the magistrate does not appear to have applied his mind to this question and the fact which transpired upon the evidence, viz., that the girl picked up the button and gave it to her mother does not in itself show that she knew that she was doing anything wrong. further, i must note that the sub-magistrate was not justified in passing a sentence of imprisonment upon the accused even if an offence had been made out. 1 reverse the conviction and sentence, and the accused will be discharged from bail.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Abdur Rahim, J.

1. The accused in this case is a girl of 10 years and has been convicted by the Sub-Magistrate of an offence under Section 381, Indian Penal Code, with respect to a silver button worth 8 annas belonging to her master, and sentenced to one month's simple imprisonment. Under Section 83, Indian Penal Code, a child between 7 and 12 years of age cannot be hold guilty of an offence with respect to any act unless it is shown that the child had attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of that act. See Queen-Empress v. Makimuddin 27 C.k 138. The Magistrate does not appear to have applied his mind to this question and the fact which transpired upon the evidence, viz., that the girl picked up the button and gave it to her mother does not in itself show that she knew that she was doing anything wrong. Further, I must note that the Sub-Magistrate was not justified in passing a sentence of imprisonment upon the accused even if an offence had been made out. 1 reverse the conviction and sentence, and the accused will be discharged from bail.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial