Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Paige Vs. Sessions

Paige vs Sessions

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1846
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/79938

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
45 U.S. 122
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Paige

Respondent

Sessions

Excerpt

.....january, 1842, which was levied on a large amount of personal property, supposed, as stated in the return of the marshal, to belong to e. j. sessions. a part of this property was claimed by martha a. sessions, the wife of e. j. sessions, as devisee of russel smith, deceased. a bond being given by the claimant, and pleadings being filed, under the statute of mississippi, the right of property was submitted to a jury, who found the title to it in the said martha, and that it was not subject to the above execution, on which verdict judgment was entered. on the trial, a bill of exceptions was filed by the plaintiff, in which was set out the record of the original judgment and execution, the will of russel smith, and the probate of the same, the inventory and appraisement of the property of the deceased, and other evidence. it is unnecessary to state this evidence in detail or to consider the legal questions which were raised in the case, as, on the same state of facts, the same legal questions were considered and decided at the last term of this court, in the case of price v. sessions, 3 how. 624. the rulings of the court in that case were sustained, and the judgment was affirmed, and the judgment in this case is also affirmed with costs.

Full Judgment

Paige v. Sessions - 45 U.S. 122 (1846)
U.S. Supreme Court Paige v. Sessions, 45 U.S. 4 How. 122 122 (1846)

Paige v. Sessions

45 U.S. (4 How.) 122

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

SYLLABUS

The decision of this Court in the case of Price v. Sessions, 3 How. 624, reviewed and confirmed.

MR. JUSTICE Mc LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

This writ of error brings before us a case from the Circuit Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

At May term, 1840, a judgment was obtained by the plaintiff against J. R. Brown, James Magee, and E. J. Sessions, for two thousand two hundred and sixty-three dollars, on which judgment an execution was issued 12 January, 1842, which was levied on a large amount of personal property, supposed, as stated in the return of the marshal, to belong to E. J. Sessions. A part of this property was claimed by Martha A. Sessions, the wife of E. J. Sessions, as devisee of Russel Smith, deceased. A bond being given by the claimant, and pleadings being filed, under the statute of Mississippi, the right of property was submitted to a jury, who found the title to it in the said Martha, and that it was not subject to the above execution, on which verdict judgment was entered. On the trial, a bill of exceptions was filed by the plaintiff, in which was set out the record of the original judgment and execution, the will of Russel Smith, and the probate of the same, the inventory and appraisement of the property of the deceased, and other evidence. It is unnecessary to state this evidence in detail or to consider the legal questions which were raised in the case, as, on the same state of facts, the same legal questions were considered and decided at the last term of this Court, in the case of Price v. Sessions, 3 How. 624. The rulings of the court in that case were sustained, and the judgment was affirmed, and the judgment in this case is also

Affirmed with costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial