Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: K. Vasudevan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Dec 01, 1943
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/797518

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: K. Vasudevan

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1944Mad238

Excerpt

- order3. it seems to us cleat that the passing of the amending act, even though it changes the law with retrospective effect, is not a sufficient reason for re-opening matters which have already been decided on the basis of the law as it stood before the amendment. the petition to excuse delay and the petition for review are therefore dismissed.

Full Judgment

ORDER

3. It seems to us cleat that the passing of the Amending Act, even though it changes the law With retrospective effect, is not a sufficient reason for re-opening matters which have already been decided on the basis of the law as it stood before the amendment. The petition to excuse delay and the petition for review are therefore dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial