Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

West Vs. Brashear

West vs Brashear

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1838
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/79603

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
37 U.S. 101
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

West

Respondent

Brashear

Excerpt

west v. brashear - 37 u.s. 101 (1838) u.s. supreme court west v. brashear, 37 u.s. 12 pet. 101 101 (1838) west v. brashear 37 u.s. (12 pet.) 101 appeal from the circuit court for the district of kentucky syllabus a defendant in an appeal, using the copy of the record received from the circuit court lodged by the appellant, cannot have the appeal docketed and dismissed under the 30th rule of the court on the ground that the appellant has failed to comply with the 37th rule, which requires a bond to be given to the clerk of the supreme court before the case is docketed. he must, to sustain a motion to dismiss the cause, produce the certificate of the circuit court stating the cause and certifying that such an appeal has been duly sued out and allowed. mr. chief justice taney delivered the opinion of the court. in this case an appeal has been taken from the decree of the circuit court for the eighth circuit, and a copy of the record in due form has been lodged by the appellants with the clerk. but the case has not been docketed, because the appellants have not filed the bond to secure the fees to the clerk of this court prescribed by the rule no. 37, adopted at january term, 1831. upon the record brought here as above-mentioned, the appellee has moved the court for leave to docket and dismiss the case under the 30th rule. we think this cannot be done. the appellee, upon producing the certificate from the clerk of the circuit court, as required by the 30th rule of this court, stating the cause and certifying that such an appeal had been duly sued out and allowed, will be entitled to have the case docketed and dismissed. but this cannot be done on the record brought here by the appellants. the motion is therefore overruled.

Full Judgment

West v. Brashear - 37 U.S. 101 (1838)
U.S. Supreme Court West v. Brashear, 37 U.S. 12 Pet. 101 101 (1838)

West v. Brashear

37 U.S. (12 Pet.) 101

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

SYLLABUS

A defendant in an appeal, using the copy of the record received from the circuit court lodged by the appellant, cannot have the appeal docketed and dismissed under the 30th rule of the Court on the ground that the appellant has failed to comply with the 37th rule, which requires a bond to be given to the clerk of the Supreme Court before the case is docketed. He must, to sustain a motion to dismiss the cause, produce the certificate of the circuit court stating the cause and certifying that such an appeal has been duly sued out and allowed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TANEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case an appeal has been taken from the decree of the Circuit Court for the Eighth Circuit, and a copy of the record in due form has been lodged by the appellants with the clerk. But the case has not been docketed, because the appellants have not filed the bond to secure the fees to the clerk of this Court prescribed by the rule No. 37, adopted at January term, 1831.

Upon the record brought here as above-mentioned, the appellee has moved the Court for leave to docket and dismiss the case under the 30th rule. We think this cannot be done. The appellee, upon producing the certificate from the clerk of the circuit court, as required by the 30th rule of this Court, stating the cause and certifying that such an appeal had been duly sued out and allowed, will be entitled to have the case docketed and dismissed. But this cannot be done on the record brought here by the appellants.

The motion is therefore

Overruled.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial