Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Pichari Anthu and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 12, 1915
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/795479

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 35 - Sentence for offence, directed to take effect after expiry of sentence for default to find security for good behaviour, legality of. - - 3 and 4 were undergoing for default to find security for good behaviour, was illegal See.

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Pichari Anthu and anr.

Legal References

Cases Referred
See. Joghi Kannigan v. Emperor
Reported In
AIR1916Mad1144(1); 30Ind.Cas.446

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 35 - sentence for offence, directed to take effect after expiry of sentence for default to find security for good behaviour, legality of. - - 3 and 4 were undergoing for default to find security for good behaviour, was illegal see.orderspencer, j.1. the sub-magistrate's direction that the sentence of two month's imprisonment for the offence under section 225b of the indian penal code should taken effect after the expiry of the sentence which the accused nos. 3 and 4 were undergoing for default to find security for good behaviour, was illegal see. joghi kannigan v. emperor 31 m.k 515 : 4 m.l.t. 223 : 8 cri. l.j. 402. i direct that it be reckoned to commence from the date of the magistrate's order, viz., 9th april 1915.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Spencer, J.

1. The Sub-Magistrate's direction that the sentence of two month's imprisonment for the offence under Section 225B of the Indian Penal Code should taken effect after the expiry of the sentence which the accused Nos. 3 and 4 were undergoing for default to find security for good behaviour, was illegal See. Joghi Kannigan v. Emperor 31 M.K 515 : 4 M.L.T. 223 : 8 Cri. L.J. 402. I direct that it be reckoned to commence from the date of the Magistrate's order, viz., 9th April 1915.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: Pichari Anthu and anr. vs Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Spencer, J.
Criminal

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales