Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Chaires

United States vs Chaires

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1836
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/79545

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
35 U.S. 308
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Chaires

Excerpt

.....decree of the judge of the superior court for the eastern district of florida confirming the claim of the appellee to twenty thousand acres of land, pursuant to the acts of congress for the adjustment of land claims in florida. in the court below, the petition was in the form prescribed by law, presenting a proper case for the jurisdiction of the court. the claim of the petitioner was founded on an application to the governor of east florida made by don jose de la moza arredondo, for a grant of twenty thousand acres of land in consideration of his services to the spanish government, which was granted on 20 march, 1817, at the place solicited, with a promise of a title in absolute property, and surveyed in one tract on 14 september, 1819. the petitioners also allege that they claim the whole land by purchase from arredondo. on an inspection of the record, we are of opinion that the title of arredondo was valid to all the land contained in the survey, and (without deciding on the claim of the petitioner as derived from him) that the claim of the petitioner to the same ought to be confirmed. the decree of the court below is therefore affirmed. this cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the superior court for the district of east florida and was argued by counsel, on consideration whereof it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said superior court for the district of east florida in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Full Judgment

United States v. Chaires - 35 U.S. 308 (1836)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Chaires, 35 U.S. 10 Pet. 308 308 (1836)

United States v. Chaires

35 U.S. (10 Pet.) 308

APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR

COURT FOR EAST FLORIDA

SYLLABUS

A grant of land by the Governor of East Florida in consideration of services to the Spanish government, made before the cession of the Territory of Florida to the United States, affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BALDWIN delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from the decree of the judge of the Superior Court for the Eastern District of Florida confirming the claim of the appellee to twenty thousand acres of land, pursuant to the acts of Congress for the adjustment of land claims in Florida. In the court below, the petition was in the form prescribed by law, presenting a proper case for the jurisdiction of the Court. The claim of the petitioner was founded on an application to the Governor of East Florida made by Don Jose de la Moza Arredondo, for a grant of twenty thousand acres of land in consideration of his services to the Spanish government, which was granted on 20 March, 1817, at the place solicited, with a promise of a title in absolute property, and surveyed in one tract on 14 September, 1819. The petitioners also allege that they claim the whole land by purchase from Arredondo. On an inspection of the record, we are of opinion that the title of Arredondo was valid to all the land contained in the survey, and (without deciding on the claim of the petitioner as derived from him) that the claim of the petitioner to the same ought to be confirmed.

The decree of the court below is therefore affirmed.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Superior Court for the District of East Florida and was argued by counsel, on consideration whereof it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this Court that the decree of the said Superior Court for the District of East Florida in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial