Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Bojji Reddi and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 15, 1938
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/793029

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Bojji Reddi and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1938Mad686; (1938)1MLJ871

Excerpt

- burn, j.1. as waller, j., observed in pachaimuthu, in re : (1932)62mlj571 , we must decline to accept the reference which is premature. the learned sessions judge is bound to dispose of the case in so far as the offences triable with the aid of assessors are concerned. he is not competent to refer the case of those offences to this court, nor can his reference give this court' jurisdiction to dispose of them. moreover from his letter of reference it would appear that the learned sessions judge is not prepared to express disagreement with the verdict of the jury so far as the first and the second accused are concerned. if that be so, the learned sessions judge must dispose of the case as against them. he cannot refer to this court under section 307 of the criminal procedure code the case of anybody in regard to whom he is in agreement with the verdict of the jury. the case will therefore go back to the learned sessions judge for disposal according to law. we, may add that we have consulted the learned public prosecutor and he has said that if this reference had come up for disposal today, he would not have been able to contend that the verdict of the jury is in any way perverse or unreasonable or against the weight of the evidence.

Full Judgment

Burn, J.

1. As Waller, J., observed in Pachaimuthu, In re : (1932)62MLJ571 , we must decline to accept the reference which is premature. The learned Sessions Judge is bound to dispose of the case in so far as the offences triable with the aid of assessors are concerned. He is not competent to refer the case of those offences to this Court, nor can his reference give this Court' jurisdiction to dispose of them. Moreover from his letter of reference it would appear that the learned Sessions Judge is not prepared to express disagreement with the verdict of the jury so far as the first and the second accused are concerned. If that be so, the learned Sessions Judge must dispose of the case as against them. He cannot refer to this Court under Section 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code the case of anybody in regard to whom he is in agreement with the verdict of the jury. The case will therefore go back to the learned Sessions Judge for disposal according to law. We, may add that we have consulted the learned Public Prosecutor and he has said that if this reference had come up for disposal today, he would not have been able to contend that the verdict of the jury is in any way perverse or unreasonable or against the weight of the evidence.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial