Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Virabhadrappa Chetti Vs. Chinnamma

Virabhadrappa Chetti vs Chinnamma

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Dec 13, 1897
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/792806

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil Procedure Code - Act XIV of 1882, Section 158--Application for succession certificate--Order for costs of adjournment against opposing party--Effect of non compliance with such order. - - Such costs would ordinarily be recoverable in execution, and, in the absence of a specific order making their payment a c...

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Virabhadrappa Chetti

Respondent

Chinnamma

Legal References

Reported In
(1898)ILR21Mad403

Excerpt

civil procedure code - act xiv of 1882, section 158--application for succession certificate--order for costs of adjournment against opposing party--effect of non compliance with such order. - - such costs would ordinarily be recoverable in execution, and, in the absence of a specific order making their payment a condition precedent to hearing the counter-petitioner's evidence, the counter-petitioner's failure to pay would not render section 158 applicable.1. so far as appears from the record the district judge seems to have dismissed the petition under section 158 of the code of civil procedure on the ground that the costs which the counter-petitioner (appellant before us) had been ordered to pay had not been paid. such costs would ordinarily be recoverable in execution, and, in the absence of a specific order making their payment a condition precedent to hearing the counter-petitioner's evidence, the counter-petitioner's failure to pay would not render section 158 applicable.2. we must, therefore, set aside the order of the district judge and direct that the petition be restored to the file and be dealt with according to law. costs will abide and follow the result.

Full Judgment

1. So far as appears from the record the District Judge seems to have dismissed the petition under Section 158 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the ground that the costs which the counter-petitioner (appellant before us) had been ordered to pay had not been paid. Such costs would ordinarily be recoverable in execution, and, in the absence of a specific order making their payment a condition precedent to hearing the counter-petitioner's evidence, the counter-petitioner's failure to pay would not render Section 158 applicable.

2. We must, therefore, set aside the order of the District Judge and direct that the petition be restored to the file and be dealt with according to law. Costs will abide and follow the result.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial