Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Queen-empress Vs. Bartlett

Queen-empress vs Bartlett

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 30, 1892
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/792805

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, Section 454 - European British subject--Relinquishment of right to be dealt with as such British subject--Trial by Second-class Magistrate. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Queen-empress

Respondent

Bartlett

Legal References

Reported In
(1893)ILR16Mad308

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, section 454 - european british subject--relinquishment of right to be dealt with as such british subject--trial by second-class magistrate. - 1. we are unable to accept the view of the district magistrate as to the interpretation of section 454, criminal procedure code, which must, we think, be read along with section 443. the second-class magistrate was disqualified to try the accused solely because the accused was a european british subject. when the accused appeared before the magistrate he relinquished his right to be dealt with as such british subject and therefore lost all the benefit of the special procedure laid down in chapter xxxiii. this is the view taken of the law by both the calcutta and bombay high courts, and we think it is the proper construction to be put upon sections 443 and 454.2. we decline to interfere.

Full Judgment

1. We are unable to accept the view of the District Magistrate as to the interpretation of Section 454, Criminal Procedure Code, which must, we think, be read along with Section 443. The Second-Class Magistrate was disqualified to try the accused solely because the accused was a European British subject. When the accused appeared before the Magistrate he relinquished his right to be dealt with as such British subject and therefore lost all the benefit of the special procedure laid down in chapter XXXIII. This is the view taken of the law by both the Calcutta and Bombay High Courts, and we think it is the proper construction to be put upon Sections 443 and 454.

2. We decline to interfere.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial