Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Kither Khan and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 17, 1908
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/792425

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 300 Exc. IV - Murder--Want of sufficient evidence of motive to commit murder--Culpable homicide not amounting to murder. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Kither Khan and anr.

Legal References

Reported In
4Ind.Cas.1116

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 300 exc. iv - murder--want of sufficient evidence of motive to commit murder--culpable homicide not amounting to murder. - 1. we have no doubt that the deceased died owing to injuries caused by the appellants. we think, however, that the offence amounts only to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. it seems clear that there was a fight between the deceased and the appellants, and that as the prosecution evidence itself shows, the deceased struck the first blow. what the cause of the fight was we can only conjecture but there is no sufficient evidence to prove any motive sufficient to induce the appellants to deliberately murder the deceased. we think the appellants may properly be given the benefit of the fourth exception to section 300, indian penal code. we, therefore, acquit the appellants of murder and find them guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. we sentence each of the appellants to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.

Full Judgment

1. We have no doubt that the deceased died owing to injuries caused by the appellants. We think, however, that the offence amounts only to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. It seems clear that there was a fight between the deceased and the appellants, and that as the prosecution evidence itself shows, the deceased Struck the first blow. What the cause of the fight was we can only conjecture but there is no sufficient evidence to prove any motive sufficient to induce the appellants to deliberately murder the deceased. We think the appellants may properly be given the benefit of the fourth exception to Section 300, Indian Penal Code. We, therefore, acquit the appellants of murder and find them guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. We sentence each of the appellants to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial