Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fischer Vs. Twigg and ors.

Fischer vs Twigg and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 29, 1897
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/792235

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Municipal Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

District Municipalities Act (Madras) - Act IV of 1884, Sections 63, 262--House-tax assessed on school buildings--Suit to recover tax payable under protest. -

Key legal issue
Municipal Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fischer

Respondent

Twigg and ors.

Legal References

Cases Referred
Nellore v. Rangayya I.L.R.
Reported In
(1898)ILR21Mad367

Excerpt

district municipalities act (madras) - act iv of 1884, sections 63, 262--house-tax assessed on school buildings--suit to recover tax payable under protest. - 1. it must be assumed that the school buildings are buildings exclusively used for charitable purposes. that being so, the buildings are exempted from the operation of the notification that may be made under section 63 of the act. a tax upon such buildings and other similar buildings mentioned in the exception is not one which can be in legal existence, and therefore it cannot be said that the tax was collected under the act. the case is thus distinguishable from the case relied upon by the petitioner's vakil--municipal council, nellore v. rangayya i.l.r. 19 mad. 10 . we prefer to base our judgment on the grounds that an imposition, which is expressly prohibited by the act, cannot be deemed to be made under the provisions of the hot, rather than on the ground that the case is one in which the party aggrieved is protected by the proviso to section 262.2. we dismiss the petition with costs.

Full Judgment

1. It must be assumed that the school buildings are buildings exclusively used for charitable purposes. That being so, the buildings are exempted from the operation of the notification that may be made under Section 63 of the Act. A tax upon such buildings and other similar buildings mentioned in the exception is not one which can be in legal existence, and therefore it cannot be said that the tax was collected under the Act. The case is thus distinguishable from the case relied upon by the petitioner's vakil--Municipal Council, Nellore v. Rangayya I.L.R. 19 Mad. 10 . We prefer to base our judgment on the grounds that an imposition, which is expressly prohibited by the Act, cannot be deemed to be made under the provisions of the hot, rather than on the ground that the case is one in which the party aggrieved is protected by the proviso to Section 262.

2. We dismiss the petition with costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial