Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gracie Vs. Palmer

Gracie vs Palmer

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1823
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78986

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
21 U.S. 699
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gracie

Respondent

Palmer

Excerpt

gracie v. palmer - 21 u.s. 699 (1823) u.s. supreme court gracie v. palmer, 21 u.s. 8 wheat. 699 699 (1823) gracie v. palmer 21 u.s. (8 wheat.) 699 syllabus it is not necessary to aver on the record that the defendant in the circuit court was an inhabitant of the district or was found therein at the time of serving the writ. where the defendant appears without taking the exception, it is an admission of the regularity of the service. mr. chief justice marshall stated that the uniform construction under the clause of the act referred to had been that it was not necessary to aver, on the record, that the defendant was an inhabitant of the district or found therein. that page 21 u. s. 700 it was sufficient if the court appeared to have jurisdiction by the citizenship or alienage of the parties. the exemption from arrest in a district in which the defendant was not an inhabitant or in which he was not found at the time of serving the process was the privilege of the defendant which he might waive by a voluntary appearance. that if process was returned by the marshal as served upon him within the district, it was sufficient, and that where the defendant voluntarily appeared in the court below, without taking the exception, it was an admission of the service, and a waiver of any further inquiry into the matter. motion denied.

Full Judgment

Gracie v. Palmer - 21 U.S. 699 (1823)
U.S. Supreme Court Gracie v. Palmer, 21 U.S. 8 Wheat. 699 699 (1823)

Gracie v. Palmer

21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 699

SYLLABUS

It is not necessary to aver on the record that the defendant in the circuit court was an inhabitant of the district or was found therein at the time of serving the writ. Where the defendant appears without taking the exception, it is an admission of the regularity of the service.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL stated that the uniform construction under the clause of the act referred to had been that it was not necessary to aver, on the record, that the defendant was an inhabitant of the district or found therein.

That

Page 21 U. S. 700

it was sufficient if the court appeared to have jurisdiction by the citizenship or alienage of the parties. The exemption from arrest in a district in which the defendant was not an inhabitant or in which he was not found at the time of serving the process was the privilege of the defendant which he might waive by a voluntary appearance. That if process was returned by the marshal as served upon him within the district, it was sufficient, and that where the defendant voluntarily appeared in the court below, without taking the exception, it was an admission of the service, and a waiver of any further inquiry into the matter.

Motion denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial