Queen-empress Vs. Ramasami

Queen-empress vs Ramasami

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 29, 1897

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/789216

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/789216
Court: Chennai
Judge: Arthur J.H. Collins C.J. and ;Benson, J.
Decided On: Sep 29, 1897
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Act X of 1882, Section 419--Presentation of criminal appeal. -

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Queen-empress

Respondent

Ramasami

Legal References

Reported In: (1898)ILR21Mad114

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - act x of 1882, section 419--presentation of criminal appeal. - 1. the cases decided by this court do not go further than to hold that, if an authorised pleader present an appeal by the hand of his clerk, the presentation should he accepted as if made by the pleader himself. it has nowhere been held that a pleader may present an appeal by a person who is not his clerk and over whose conduct and actions he has no control.2. we cannot therefore say that the head assistant magistrate was wrong in rejecting these appeals.

Full Judgment

1. The cases decided by this Court do not go further than to hold that, if an authorised pleader present an appeal by the hand of his clerk, the presentation should he accepted as if made by the pleader himself. It has nowhere been held that a pleader may present an appeal by a person who is not his clerk and over whose conduct and actions he has no control.

2. We cannot therefore say that the Head Assistant Magistrate was wrong in rejecting these appeals.

Same Parties Queen-empress vs Ramasami Same Subject Civil Same Judge Arthur J.H. Collins C.J. and ;Benson, J.

Civil