Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

MoidIn Vs. Chandu

Moidin vs Chandu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 03, 1883
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/788624

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil Procedure Code, Section 349 - Insolvency--Security bond, Enforcement of--Remedy. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moidin

Respondent

Chandu

Legal References

Reported In
(1883)ILR7Mad273

Excerpt

civil procedure code, section 349 - insolvency--security bond, enforcement of--remedy. - charles a. turner, kt., c.j.1. there appears to be no provision in the code for enforcing summarily a surety bond given under the section (349) and no appeal from an order refusing summary enforcement of the surety bond, and the only course open to the party who desires it should be enforced is to move the court to put it in suit.2. whether, under the circumstances, the suit would succeed we need not now determine.3. the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Full Judgment

Charles A. Turner, Kt., C.J.

1. There appears to be no provision in the Code for enforcing summarily a surety bond given under the section (349) and no appeal from an order refusing summary enforcement of the surety bond, and the only course open to the party who desires it should be enforced is to move the Court to put it in suit.

2. Whether, under the circumstances, the suit would succeed we need not now determine.

3. The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial