Full Judgment
Muttusami Ayyar and Shephard, JJ.
1. Following the ruling of the Full Bench we dismiss the petition for amendment and cancel the amendment made with reference to it.
2. The petitioner is entitled to his costs.
Pichuvayyangar Vs. Seshayyangar
Pichuvayyangar vs Seshayyangar
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/787935
- Court
- Chennai
- Judge
- Arthur J.H. Collins, Kt. C.J.,; Muttusami Ayyar and ;Shephard, JJ.
- Decided On
- Dec 14, 1894
- Subject
- Civil
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
Civil Procedure Code - Act XIV of 1882, Section 206--Amendment of decree--Power of Court of First Instance after appeal. -
- Key legal issue
- Civil
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
Pichuvayyangar
Respondent
Seshayyangar
Legal References
- Reported In
- (1895)ILR18Mad214
Excerpt
civil procedure code - act xiv of 1882, section 206--amendment of decree--power of court of first instance after appeal. - muttusami ayyar and shephard, jj.1. following the ruling of the full bench we dismiss the petition for amendment and cancel the amendment made with reference to it.2. the petitioner is entitled to his costs.