Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Pesala Subrahmanyam

Disposition Petition allowed Court Chennai Decided Sep 14, 1949
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/786763

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Revn. No. 1159 and Cri. Revn. Petn. No. 1099 of 1948
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed
Acts & sections
Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3(2)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Pesala Subrahmanyam

Advocate K.S. Jayarama Iyer, ; C.K. Venkatanara and ;Simham, Advs.

Respondent

Advocate Asst. Public Prosecutor

Legal References

Acts
Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3(2)
Reported In
AIR1950Mad308a

Excerpt

- ordersomasundaram, j.1. in this case the petitioner has been convicted for having sold on 10th march 1948 a bag of salt at rs. 5-4-0 when the controlled rate was rs. 3-4-7 a bag. the rate of salt was fixed by means of a notification issued by the collector of the district in the district gazette. the notification is issued under section 3 (2) (c) of central act xxiv [24] of 1946. under that section the fair price has to be fixed by notified order. notifled order has been defined in the act as an order notified in the official gazette. official gazette has not been defined in the act. but under the general clauses act it means the gazette of india or as the case may be the gazette of a province. in this province the official gazette is fort saint george gazette. it is conceded by the public prosecutor that there is no notification in the fort saint george gazette corresponding to the notification in the nellore gazette. the relevant notification of the collector in the nellore gazette, without its being published also in the fort saint george gazette is not valid.2. the accused cannot be convicted for an offence under a notification which is invalid. the conviction and sentence are therefore set aside and the accused is acquitted. the order of confiscation also is set aside. the salt bag or its value will be returned to the petitioner.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Somasundaram, J.

1. In this case the petitioner has been convicted for having sold on 10th March 1948 a bag of salt at Rs. 5-4-0 when the controlled rate was Rs. 3-4-7 a bag. The rate of salt was fixed by means of a notification issued by the Collector of the district in the District Gazette. The notification is issued under Section 3 (2) (c) of Central Act XXIV [24] of 1946. Under that section the fair price has to be fixed by notified order. Notifled order has been defined in the Act as an order notified in the Official Gazette. Official Gazette has not been defined in the Act. But under the General Clauses Act it means the Gazette of India or as the case may be the gazette of a province. In this province the Official Gazette is Fort Saint George Gazette. It is conceded by the Public Prosecutor that there is no notification in the Fort Saint George Gazette corresponding to the notification in the Nellore Gazette. The relevant notification of the Collector in the Nellore Gazette, without its being published also in the Fort Saint George Gazette is not valid.

2. The accused cannot be convicted for an offence under a notification which is invalid. The conviction and sentence are therefore set aside and the accused is acquitted. The order of confiscation also is set aside. The salt bag or its value will be returned to the petitioner.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial