Skip to content
Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Pullayya Vs. Ramayya

Pullayya vs Ramayya

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 22, 1894
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/786612
Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil;Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pullayya

Respondent

Ramayya

Legal References

Cases Referred
Kishori Mohun Roy Chowdhry v. Chunder Nath Pal I.L.R.
Reported In
(1895)ILR18Mad144

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

code of civil procedure - act xiv of 1882, sections 316, 318--execution of decrees--delivery of immoveable property in possession of judgment--debtor--suit by assignee of purchaser at court sale for possession--limitation. - - plaintiff bought from the purchaser at the court sale and can be in no better position than his vendor.1. here the judgment-debtor was in possession at the date of the sale and is now defendant. plaintiff bought from the purchaser at the court sale and can be in no better position than his vendor. nothing was done upon the writ of possession issued at the suit of the vendor's widow. the execution purchaser would be barred and therefore the plaintiff is equally barred arumuga v. chockalinqam i.l.r. 15 mad. 831 the decision in kishori mohun roy chowdhry v. chunder nath pal i.l.r. 14 cal. 644 is distinguished by the fact that in that case there was formal delivery. we must reverse the decree and we dismiss the suit with costs throughout.

Full Judgment

1. Here the judgment-debtor was in possession at the date of the sale and is now defendant. Plaintiff bought from the purchaser at the Court sale and can be in no better position than his vendor. Nothing was done upon the writ of possession issued at the suit of the vendor's widow. The execution purchaser would be barred and therefore the plaintiff is equally barred Arumuga v. Chockalinqam I.L.R. 15 Mad. 831 The decision in Kishori Mohun Roy Chowdhry v. Chunder Nath Pal I.L.R. 14 Cal. 644 is distinguished by the fact that in that case there was formal delivery. We must reverse the decree and we dismiss the suit with costs throughout.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial