Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pullayya Vs. Ramayya

Pullayya vs Ramayya

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 22, 1894
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/786612

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil;Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Code of Civil Procedure - Act XIV of 1882, Sections 316, 318--Execution of decrees--Delivery of immoveable property in possession of judgment--debtor--Suit by assignee of purchaser at Court sale for possession--Limitation. - - Plaintiff bought from the purchaser at the Court sale and can be in no better position t...

Key legal issue
Civil;Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pullayya

Respondent

Ramayya

Legal References

Cases Referred
Kishori Mohun Roy Chowdhry v. Chunder Nath Pal I.L.R.
Reported In
(1895)ILR18Mad144

Excerpt

code of civil procedure - act xiv of 1882, sections 316, 318--execution of decrees--delivery of immoveable property in possession of judgment--debtor--suit by assignee of purchaser at court sale for possession--limitation. - - plaintiff bought from the purchaser at the court sale and can be in no better position than his vendor.1. here the judgment-debtor was in possession at the date of the sale and is now defendant. plaintiff bought from the purchaser at the court sale and can be in no better position than his vendor. nothing was done upon the writ of possession issued at the suit of the vendor's widow. the execution purchaser would be barred and therefore the plaintiff is equally barred arumuga v. chockalinqam i.l.r. 15 mad. 831 the decision in kishori mohun roy chowdhry v. chunder nath pal i.l.r. 14 cal. 644 is distinguished by the fact that in that case there was formal delivery. we must reverse the decree and we dismiss the suit with costs throughout.

Full Judgment

1. Here the judgment-debtor was in possession at the date of the sale and is now defendant. Plaintiff bought from the purchaser at the Court sale and can be in no better position than his vendor. Nothing was done upon the writ of possession issued at the suit of the vendor's widow. The execution purchaser would be barred and therefore the plaintiff is equally barred Arumuga v. Chockalinqam I.L.R. 15 Mad. 831 The decision in Kishori Mohun Roy Chowdhry v. Chunder Nath Pal I.L.R. 14 Cal. 644 is distinguished by the fact that in that case there was formal delivery. We must reverse the decree and we dismiss the suit with costs throughout.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial