Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Boyamma Vs. Balajee Rau

Boyamma vs Balajee Rau

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 27, 1897
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/786113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Limitation Act - Act XV of 1877, Section 4--Gazetted holiday--Computation of time. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Boyamma

Respondent

Balajee Rau

Legal References

Reported In
(1897)ILR20Mad469

Excerpt

limitation act - act xv of 1877, section 4--gazetted holiday--computation of time. - 1. we do not think that the fact that the district judge held court on a gazetted holiday is sufficient to disentitle the appellant to regard the day as dies non in calculating the time allowed by law .for presenting an appeal.2. we, therefore, set aside the order of the district judge refusing to admit the appeal and direct him to now admit it and dispose of it according to law. costs will abide and follow the result.

Full Judgment

1. We do not think that the fact that the District Judge held Court on a gazetted holiday is sufficient to disentitle the appellant to regard the day as dies non in calculating the time allowed by law .for presenting an appeal.

2. We, therefore, set aside the order of the District Judge refusing to admit the appeal and direct him to now admit it and dispose of it according to law. Costs will abide and follow the result.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial