Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Gordon

United States vs Gordon

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1813
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78558

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
11 U.S. 287
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Gordon

Excerpt

united states v. gordon - 11 u.s. 287 (1813) u.s. supreme court united states v. gordon, 11 u.s. 7 cranch 287 287 (1813) united states v. gordon 11 u.s. (7 cranch) 287 syllabus decided: a writ of error does not lie to carry to the supreme court of the united states a civil cause which has been carried from the district to the circuit court by writ of error. this was an action of debt brought in the district court of the united states for the district of virginia, upon an embargo bond, dated 2 november, 1808, conditioned to reland the cargo of the essex in some port of the united states, the danger of the seas only excepted. the defendants, among other things, pleaded the following plea, viz.: "and the said defendants for further plea why the united states ought not to have and maintain the said action, say that the said bond was given and executed for more than double the value of the vessel and cargo mentioned in the recital and condition of the said bond, to-wit in a sum of $8,000 more than double the said value, and the said last mentioned defendants aver that the obligors were constrained to execute the said bond by the refusal of the collector of the port of tappahannock to clear and permit the said vessel and her cargo to depart from the port and district of tappahannock until the same bond was executed as aforesaid, and this they are ready to verify." to this plea there was a general demurrer, which was overruled by the district judge (tyler). the page 11 u. s. 288 united states carried the cause up to the circuit court by writ of error, where the judgment was affirmed by mr. justice marshall. the united states brought another writ of error to the supreme court of the united states, which was dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of the case of united states v. goodwin at the last term.

Full Judgment

United States v. Gordon - 11 U.S. 287 (1813)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Gordon, 11 U.S. 7 Cranch 287 287 (1813)

United States v. Gordon

11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 287

SYLLABUS

Decided: a writ of error does not lie to carry to the Supreme Court of the United States a civil cause which has been carried from the district to the circuit court by writ of error.

This was an action of debt brought in the District Court of the United States for the District of Virginia, upon an embargo bond, dated 2 November, 1808, conditioned to reland the cargo of the Essex in some port of the United States, the danger of the seas only excepted.

The defendants, among other things, pleaded the following plea, viz.:

"And the said defendants for further plea why the United States ought not to have and maintain the said action, say that the said bond was given and executed for more than double the value of the vessel and cargo mentioned in the recital and condition of the said bond, to-wit in a sum of $8,000 more than double the said value, and the said last mentioned defendants aver that the obligors were constrained to execute the said bond by the refusal of the collector of the port of Tappahannock to clear and permit the said vessel and her cargo to depart from the port and district of Tappahannock until the same bond was executed as aforesaid, and this they are ready to verify."

To this plea there was a general demurrer, which was overruled by the district judge (Tyler). The

Page 11 U. S. 288

United States carried the cause up to the circuit court by writ of error, where the judgment was affirmed by Mr. Justice Marshall.

The United States brought another writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States, which was dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of the case of United States v. Goodwin at the last term.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial