Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kader Batcha and ors. Vs. Kader Batcha Rowthan and ors.

Kader Batcha and ors. vs Kader Batcha Rowthan and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 17, 1905
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/785349

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code Act V of 1898, Section 117 - Dispute as to right to use a mosque within the section--Charter Act, Section 15. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kader Batcha and ors.

Respondent

Kader Batcha Rowthan and ors.

Legal References

Cases Referred
Code of Criminal Procedure and Muhammad Musaliar v. Kunji Check Musaliar I.L.R.
Reported In
(1906)ILR29Mad237

Excerpt

criminal procedure code act v of 1898, section 117 - dispute as to right to use a mosque within the section--charter act, section 15. - orders. shabrahmania ayyar, officiating c.j.1. no doubt there was no enquiry in this case as to who was in possession of the mosque. the order therefore in so far as it declares possession to be with the second party cannot be maintained and the vakil who represents that party encodes this. as to the real point in question it is clear that a dispute as to a right to use a mosque by persons claiming to be entitled to officiate as kazis therein is a dispute coming within section 147 of the code of criminal procedure and muhammad musaliar v. kunji check musaliar i.l.r. 11 mad. 323, so far as it goes confirms the above view. the order will therefore be modified by directing that ibrahim and kather ibrahim shall not be introduced into the mosque to officiate therein, by the five individuals mentioned in the magistrate's order as forming party no. i until the decision of a competent civil court recognizing the alleged right is obtained by them.

Full Judgment

ORDER

S. Shabrahmania Ayyar, Officiating C.J.

1. No doubt there was no enquiry in this case as to who was in possession of the mosque. The order therefore in so far as it declares possession to be with the second party cannot be maintained and the vakil who represents that party encodes this. As to the real point in question it is clear that a dispute as to a right to use a mosque by persons claiming to be entitled to officiate as Kazis therein is a dispute coming within Section 147 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Muhammad Musaliar v. Kunji Check Musaliar I.L.R. 11 Mad. 323, so far as it goes confirms the above view. The order will therefore be modified by directing that Ibrahim and Kather Ibrahim shall not be introduced into the mosque to officiate therein, by the five individuals mentioned in the Magistrate's order as forming party No. I until the decision of a competent Civil Court recognizing the alleged right is obtained by them.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial