Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Riddle and Company Vs. Mandeville and Jamesson

Riddle and Company vs Mandeville and Jamesson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1810
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78492

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
10 U.S. 86
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Riddle and Company

Respondent

Mandeville and Jamesson

Excerpt

riddle & company v. mandeville & jamesson - 10 u.s. 86 (1810) u.s. supreme court riddle & company v. mandeville & jamesson, 10 u.s. 6 cranch 86 86 (1810) riddle & company v. mandeville & jamesson 10 u.s. (6 cranch) 86 syllabus the court below, upon a mandate on reversal of its judgment, may award execution for the costs of the appellant in that court. a mandate had been issued upon the reversal of the decree in this case at the last term, in which "this court, proceeding to give such decree as the said circuit court ought to have given, doth decree and order that the defendants pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $1,500, that being the amount of the note in the bill mentioned, together with interest thereon from the time the same became due, you are hereby commanded, that such execution and proceedings be had on the said decree of the said supreme court as, according to equity and justice and the laws of the united states, ought to he had, the said writ of error notwithstanding." nothing having been said respecting the costs, the court below had not issued execution for the costs of the appellant. mr. chief justice marshall. the court below is always competent to award costs in a chancery suit in that court, and, in case of a mandate, may issue execution therefor.

Full Judgment

Riddle & Company v. Mandeville & Jamesson - 10 U.S. 86 (1810)
U.S. Supreme Court Riddle & Company v. Mandeville & Jamesson, 10 U.S. 6 Cranch 86 86 (1810)

Riddle & Company v. Mandeville & Jamesson

10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 86

SYLLABUS

The court below, upon a mandate on reversal of its judgment, may award execution for the costs of the appellant in that court.

A mandate had been issued upon the reversal of the decree in this case at the last term, in which

"this Court, proceeding to give such decree as the said circuit court ought to have given, doth decree and order that the defendants pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $1,500, that being the amount of the note in the bill mentioned, together with interest thereon from the time the same became due, you are hereby commanded, that such execution and proceedings be had on the said decree of the said Supreme Court as, according to equity and justice and the laws of the United States, ought to he had, the said writ of error notwithstanding."

Nothing having been said respecting the costs, the court below had not issued execution for the costs of the appellant.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL.

The court below is always competent to award costs in a chancery suit in that court, and, in case of a mandate, may issue execution therefor.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial