Young Vs. Grundy

Young vs Grundy

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1810

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78487

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/78487
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1810
Case Number: 10 U.S. 51
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Young

Respondent

Grundy

Excerpt

young v. grundy - 10 u.s. 51 (1810) u.s. supreme court young v. grundy, 10 u.s. 51 (1810) young v. grundy 10 u.s. 51 appeal from a decree of the district of columbia syllabus on an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the district of columbia dismissing an injunction, it was decided that no writ of error or appeal lies to an interlocutory decree of the circuit court dissolving an injunction. if the answer neither admits nor denies the allegations of the bill, they must be proved on the final hearing, but upon a question of dissolution of an injunction, they are to be taken to be true. the decree dissolves the injunction with costs, which is a final decree as to the costs. 2 wash. 200, davenport v. mason. the material facts of the bill are not denied nor admitted by the answer; they are therefore to be taken as true. the court below must therefore have proceeded on the ground that the original equity between the maker and payee of the note did affect the endorsee. mr. chief justice marshall. if the answer neither admits nor denies the allegations of the bill, they must be proved upon the final hearing. upon a question of dissolution of an injunction, they are to be taken to be true. but the court has no doubt upon the question. page 10 u. s. 52 no appeal or writ of error will lie to an interlocutory decree dissolving an injunction. writ of error dismissed with costs.

Full Judgment

Young v. Grundy - 10 U.S. 51 (1810)
U.S. Supreme Court Young v. Grundy, 10 U.S. 51 (1810)

Young v. Grundy

10 U.S. 51

APPEAL FROM A DECREE OF

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SYLLABUS

On an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the District of Columbia dismissing an injunction, it was decided that no writ of error or appeal lies to an interlocutory decree of the circuit court dissolving an injunction.

If the answer neither admits nor denies the allegations of the bill, they must be proved on the final hearing, but upon a question of dissolution of an injunction, they are to be taken to be true.

The decree dissolves the injunction with costs, which is a final decree as to the costs. 2 Wash. 200, Davenport v. Mason.

The material facts of the bill are not denied nor admitted by the answer; they are therefore to be taken as true. The court below must therefore have proceeded on the ground that the original equity between the maker and payee of the note did affect the endorsee.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL.

If the answer neither admits nor denies the allegations of the bill, they must be proved upon the final hearing. Upon a question of dissolution of an injunction, they are to be taken to be true.

But the Court has no doubt upon the question.

Page 10 U. S. 52

No appeal or writ of error will lie to an interlocutory decree dissolving an injunction.

Writ of error dismissed with costs.

Same Parties Young vs Grundy Same Subject Education

Education interlocutory decree Material facts chief justice circuit court material fact supreme court writ of error