Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Evans

United States vs Evans

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1809
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78465

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
9 U.S. 280
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Evans

Excerpt

united states v. evans - 9 u.s. 280 (1809) u.s. supreme court united states v. evans, 9 u.s. 5 cranch 280 280 (1809) united states v. evans 9 u.s. (5 cranch) 280 error to the district court for the kentucky district syllabus in this case it was decided: it is not a ground for a writ of error that the judge below refused to reinstate a cause after nonsuit. in the court below, the judge at the trial rejected certain testimony which was offered by the attorney for the united states, who thereupon took a bill of exceptions, and became nonsuit, and afterwards, at the same term moved the court to set aside the nonsuit and grant a new trial upon the ground that the judge had erred in rejecting the testimony. but the court overruled the motion and refused a new trial, whereupon the attorney for the united states sued out his writ of error. page 9 u. s. 281 mr. chief justice marshall delivered the opinion of the court that in such a case, where there has been a nonsuit and a motion to reinstate overruled, the court could not interfere. judgment affirmed.

Full Judgment

United States v. Evans - 9 U.S. 280 (1809)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Evans, 9 U.S. 5 Cranch 280 280 (1809)

United States v. Evans

9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 280

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE KENTUCKY DISTRICT

SYLLABUS

In this case it was decided:

It is not a ground for a writ of error that the judge below refused to reinstate a cause after nonsuit.

In the court below, the judge at the trial rejected certain testimony which was offered by the attorney for the United States, who thereupon took a bill of exceptions, and became nonsuit, and afterwards, at the same term moved the court to set aside the nonsuit and grant a new trial upon the ground that the judge had erred in rejecting the testimony. But the court overruled the motion and refused a new trial, whereupon the attorney for the United States sued out his writ of error.

Page 9 U. S. 281

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court that in such a case, where there has been a nonsuit and a motion to reinstate overruled, the Court could not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial