Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Wilson Vs. the Madras Municipality

Wilson vs The Madras Municipality

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Oct 08, 1895
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/783442

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Motor Vehicle

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

City of Madras Municipal Act - Act I of 1884, Schedule B--Vehicle Tax--Bicycle. - - Clearly, as appears from the language of schedule B, the term is not confined to carriages drawn by horses or other beasts of burden.

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicle

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wilson

Respondent

The Madras Municipality

Legal References

Cases Referred
Williams v. Ellis L.R.
Reported In
(1896)ILR19Mad83

Excerpt

city of madras municipal act - act i of 1884, schedule b--vehicle tax--bicycle. - - clearly, as appears from the language of schedule b, the term is not confined to carriages drawn by horses or other beasts of burden......and not qualified by reference to any particular kinds of vehicle. clearly, as appears from the language of schedule b, the term is not confined to carriages drawn by horses or other beasts of burden. a perambulator used for children is within the operation, though it may be exempted under the proviso to section 153 1.2. the case of williams v. ellis l.r. 5 q.b.d. 175 is distinguishable for the reason that, in the statute there under consideration, various special kinds of carriages were mentioned, and therefore the rule of ejusdem generis applied. as it cannot be doubted that a bicycle is a vehicle in the general acceptation of the word, so we think there is no doubt that this particular bicycle is a vehicle with springs. we must, therefore, answer the question in the affirmative.1. section 153: a tax at a rate not exceeding the rates specified in tax on vehicles and schedule b may be imposed on the vehicles and animals animals. mentioned therein kept or let out for hire or used within the city. such tax shall be payable half-yearly for each half of the year: the amount payable for each half of the year shall be payable by any person in whose payable half-yearly in possession or custody or control any such vehicle or animal may advance. be found so soon as it has been for thirty days kept or let out for hire or used within the city. not liable inn possession but no person shall be liable under this section for any for less than thirty days vehicle or animal which has been in his possession for less than half year. thirtydays in any half-year. provided that no person by reason of transfer of ownership shall be liable to take out a lieense as hereinafter provided for any vehicle or animal which had already been licensed for the half-year in which ownership was transferred. provided also that the president may exempt from taxation under this section any vehicle used solely for the conveyance of children.

Full Judgment

1. We are of opinion that a bicycle is a vehicle with springs within the meaning of the Madras Act I of 1884. The word 'vehicle' is not defined in the Act. The term is used by itself and not qualified by reference to any particular kinds of vehicle. Clearly, as appears from the language of schedule B, the term is not confined to carriages drawn by horses or other beasts of burden. A perambulator used for children is within the operation, though it may be exempted under the proviso to Section 153 1.

2. The case of Williams v. Ellis L.R. 5 Q.B.D. 175 is distinguishable for the reason that, in the statute there under consideration, various special kinds of carriages were mentioned, and therefore the rule of ejusdem generis applied. As it cannot be doubted that a bicycle is a vehicle in the general acceptation of the word, so we think there is no doubt that this particular bicycle is a vehicle with springs. We must, therefore, answer the question in the affirmative.

1.

Section 153: A tax at a rate not exceeding the rates specified in

Tax on vehicles and Schedule B may be imposed on the vehicles and animals

animals. mentioned therein kept or let out for hire or used within the

City.

Such tax shall be payable half-yearly for each half of the year: the amount payable for

each half of the year shall be payable by any person in whose

Payable half-yearly in possession or custody or control any such vehicle or animal may

advance. be found so soon as it has been for thirty days kept or let out

for hire or used within the City.

Not liable inn possession But no person shall be liable under this section for any

for less than thirty days vehicle or animal which has been in his possession for less than

half year. thirtydays in any half-year.

Provided that no person by reason of transfer of ownership shall be liable to take out a

lieense as hereinafter provided for any vehicle or animal which had already been licensed

for the half-year in which ownership was transferred.

Provided also that the President may exempt from taxation under this section any vehicle

used solely for the conveyance of children.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial