Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Capron Vs. Van Noorden

Capron vs Van Noorden

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1804
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78318

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
6 U.S. 126
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Capron

Respondent

Van Noorden

Excerpt

capron v. van noorden - 6 u.s. 126 (1804) u.s. supreme court capron v. van noorden, 6 u.s. 126 (1804) 6 u.s. 126 (cranch) capron v. van noorden. february term, 1804 error to the circuit court of north carolina. the plaintiff, without describing himself as an alien or citizen, instituted an action of trespass in the case against the defendant, said to be 'late of pitt county,' and a verdict and judgment were given in favour of the defendant. mr. capron sued out a writ of error, and assigned for error that the record did not show that the circuit court had jurisdiction, the parties not being described, so as to show they were within the provisions of the act of congress. the only question submitted to the court was, whether the plaintiff could assign as error his own omissions and irregularities in the pleadings. page 6 u.s. 126, 127 the defendant did not appear, but the citation being duly served, the judgment was reversed.

Full Judgment

CAPRON v. VAN NOORDEN - 6 U.S. 126 (1804)
U.S. Supreme Court CAPRON v. VAN NOORDEN, 6 U.S. 126 (1804)

6 U.S. 126 (Cranch)

CAPRON
v.
VAN NOORDEN.

February Term, 1804

ERROR to the circuit court of North Carolina.

The plaintiff, without describing himself as an alien or citizen, instituted an action of trespass in the case against the defendant, said to be 'late of Pitt county,' and a verdict and judgment were given in favour of the defendant.

Mr. Capron sued out a writ of error, and assigned for error that the record did not show that the circuit court had jurisdiction, the parties not being described, so as to show they were within the provisions of the act of congress.

The only question submitted to the court was, whether the plaintiff could assign as error his own omissions and irregularities in the pleadings.

Page 6 U.S. 126, 127

The defendant did not appear, but the citation being duly served, the judgment was reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial