Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lloyd Vs. Alexander

Lloyd vs Alexander

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1803
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78300

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
5 U.S. 365
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lloyd

Respondent

Alexander

Excerpt

lloyd v. alexander - 5 u.s. 365 (1803) u.s. supreme court lloyd v. alexander, 5 u.s. 1 cranch 365 365 (1803) lloyd v. alexander 5 u.s. (1 cranch) 365 syllabus the citation had not been served on the defendant in error thirty days, and the court would not take up the cause until the thirty days had expired, unless the defendant in error should appear. page 5 u. s. 366 mr. chief justice marshall. the law respecting the thirty days' notice on a writ of error and the ten days allowed for filing it was predicated upon the existing state of things at the time of passing the act, at which time there was no circuit court whose term would not be finished more than forty days before the sitting of the supreme court. the times of the session of the courts have been altered, but no alteration has been made in the law respecting the thirty days' notice, which makes it difficult to form a rule in the case. at present, if the citation has not been served thirty days, the court will not take up the cause until the thirty days have expired, unless the defendant in error shall appear. a citation not served is as no citation.

Full Judgment

Lloyd v. Alexander - 5 U.S. 365 (1803)
U.S. Supreme Court Lloyd v. Alexander, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 365 365 (1803)

Lloyd v. Alexander

5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 365

SYLLABUS

The citation had not been served on the defendant in error thirty days, and the Court would not take up the cause until the thirty days had expired, unless the defendant in error should appear.

Page 5 U. S. 366

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL.

The law respecting the thirty days' notice on a writ of error and the ten days allowed for filing it was predicated upon the existing state of things at the time of passing the act, at which time there was no circuit court whose term would not be finished more than forty days before the sitting of the Supreme Court.

The times of the session of the courts have been altered, but no alteration has been made in the law respecting the thirty days' notice, which makes it difficult to form a rule in the case.

At present, if the citation has not been served thirty days, the Court will not take up the cause until the thirty days have expired, unless the defendant in error shall appear.

A citation not served is as no citation.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial