Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Reference Under Stamp Act, Section 46

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 01, 1898
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/782471

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Stamp Act - Act I of 1879, Section 3 (9), (19)--Settlement--Gift--Conveyance. - - 1. The first case is clearly distinguishable from that decided in 1884--[Reference under Stamp Act, Section 46 I.

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Reference Under Stamp Act, Section 46

Legal References

Reported In
(1898)ILR21Mad422

Excerpt

stamp act - act i of 1879, section 3 (9), (19)--settlement--gift--conveyance. - - 1. the first case is clearly distinguishable from that decided in 1884--[reference under stamp act, section 46 i.1. the first case is clearly distinguishable from that decided in 1884--[reference under stamp act, section 46 i.l.r. 7 mad. 349 for there, there was an absolute and unqualified disposition of property by way of gift. here there was a provision merely for the life of the donee with reversion to the settlor and his heirs. we think this document (no. 417 of 1897) is a settlement within the meaning of the stamp act.2. the other document no. 1364 of 1897 is certainly neither a settlement nor a gift. there was consideration other than that of marriage. we think it must be treated as a conveyance and stamped accordingly.

Full Judgment

1. The first case is clearly distinguishable from that decided in 1884--[Reference under Stamp Act, Section 46 I.L.R. 7 Mad. 349 for there, there was an absolute and unqualified disposition of property by way of gift. Here there was a provision merely for the life of the donee with reversion to the settlor and his heirs. We think this document (No. 417 of 1897) is a settlement within the meaning of the Stamp Act.

2. The other document No. 1364 of 1897 is certainly neither a settlement nor a gift. There was consideration other than that of marriage. We think it must be treated as a conveyance and stamped accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial