Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Jevan and ors.

The Public Prosecutor vs Jevan and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 29, 1941
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/782313

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Public Prosecutor

Respondent

Jevan and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1941Mad845; (1941)2MLJ349

Excerpt

- lakshmana rao, j.1. these are appeals by the provincial government against the orders of acquittal of the respondents of an offence under section 123 (1) of the motor vehicles act.2. the respondents are drivers of transport vehicles and they were prosecuted under section 123 (1) of the motor vehicles act for driving the vehicles on the public road without a permit authorising the use of the vehicles in a public place. they pleaded that it was the duty of the owner to obtain the permit and accepting their plea the sub-magistrate acquitted them.3. the alleged driving of the transport vehicles on the public road without a permit authorising the use of the vehicles in a public place was not denied by the respondents, and so far as is material, section 42 (1) of the motor vehicles act provides that no owner of a transport vehicle shall use or permit the use of the vehicle in any public place save in accordance with the conditions of a permit authorising the use of the vehicle in that place. the driving of a transport vehicle on the public road without such a permit would certainly contravene section 42 (1) of the act; and section 123 (1) enacts that whoever drives a motor vehicle in contravention of the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 4- shall be punishable with fine. that the permit is to be obtained by the owner cannot make any difference and whoever drives the vehicle in a public place without a permit authorising the use of the vehicle in that place would be punishable under section 123 (1) of the act. the orders of acquittal are therefore set aside and the respondents are convicted under section 123 (1) of the motor vehicles act. they are sentenced to pay a fine of rs. 5 each and in default to simple imprisonment for one week.

Full Judgment

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. These are appeals by the Provincial Government against the orders of acquittal of the respondents of an offence under Section 123 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

2. The respondents are drivers of transport vehicles and they were prosecuted under Section 123 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving the vehicles on the public road without a permit authorising the use of the vehicles in a public place. They pleaded that it was the duty of the owner to obtain the permit and accepting their plea the Sub-Magistrate acquitted them.

3. The alleged driving of the transport vehicles on the public road without a permit authorising the use of the vehicles in a public place was not denied by the respondents, and so far as is material, Section 42 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act provides that no owner of a transport vehicle shall use or permit the use of the vehicle in any public place save in accordance with the conditions of a permit authorising the use of the vehicle in that place. The driving of a transport vehicle on the public road without such a permit would certainly contravene Section 42 (1) of the Act; and Section 123 (1) enacts that whoever drives a motor vehicle in contravention of the provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 4- shall be punishable with fine. That the permit is to be obtained by the owner cannot make any difference and whoever drives the vehicle in a public place without a permit authorising the use of the vehicle in that place would be punishable under Section 123 (1) of the Act. The orders of acquittal are therefore set aside and the respondents are convicted under Section 123 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act. They are sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 5 each and in default to simple imprisonment for one week.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial