Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Peria Muthirian and ors. Vs. Karappanna Muthirian and anr.

Peria Muthirian and ors. vs Karappanna Muthirian and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 15, 1906
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/781699

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil Procedure Code - Act XIV of 1882, Section 373--Court has power to extend time for payment of costs. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Peria Muthirian and ors.

Respondent

Karappanna Muthirian and anr.

Legal References

Reported In
(1906)ILR29Mad370

Excerpt

civil procedure code - act xiv of 1882, section 373--court has power to extend time for payment of costs. - 1. the order of the district munsif was that costs were to be paid on or before the 24th june 1904. it was not however till the 11th july that the amount of the costs was ascertained and even then the amount was incorrect and it was not till the 29th july that the correct figures were given. application for extension of time in which to pay was made on the 30th july. we must hold that the district munsif exercised a sound discretion in extending the time for payment inasmuch as it was absolutely impossible for the plaintiffs to pay the amount of costs into court on or before the date originally fixed, i.e., the 24th june we allow this appeal, set aside the order of the learned judge and restore that of the district munsif with costs before mr. justice boddam and in this court.

Full Judgment

1. The order of the District Munsif was that costs were to be paid on or before the 24th June 1904. It was not however till the 11th July that the amount of the costs was ascertained and even then the amount was incorrect and it was not till the 29th July that the correct figures were given. Application for extension of time in which to pay was made on the 30th July. We must hold that the District Munsif exercised a sound discretion in extending the time for payment inasmuch as it was absolutely impossible for the plaintiffs to pay the amount of costs into Court on or before the date originally fixed, i.e., the 24th June We allow this appeal, set aside the order of the learned Judge and restore that of the District Munsif with costs before Mr. Justice Boddam and in this Court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial