Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Kuppammal and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 28, 1921
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/781612

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Kuppammal and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
(1921)41MLJ562

Excerpt

- orderkumaraswamy sastri, j.1. i think clause xi of section 71 of the city police act covers a, case of obstructing a thorughfare in any manner and is not limited to obstruction caused by vehicles and animals. there is no reason to suppose that the legislature intended to permit all other kinds of obstruction and punish only obstructions by vehicles or animals. there is a semi-colon before the sentence 'or in any way wilfully obstructs etc.' in the case of obstruction by vehicles and animals there is no question of intention, the act and obstruction caused by the act are sufficient. in other cases intention is necessary to be proved in addition to the obstruction. these are questions of fact to be determined by. the magistrate. the fact that act iii of. 1889 contains clause 6 to section 3 which deals with exposing goods for sale so as to cause obstruction which follows clause 5 which is similar in terms to clause xi of the city police act affords no guide to the interpretation of the city police act. probably the legislature intended to place the matter beyond all doubt.2. i am of opinion that the accused will be guilty of an offence under clsuse xi of section 71 of the city police act if the requisite intention and the fact of obstruction are proved.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Kumaraswamy Sastri, J.

1. I think Clause XI of Section 71 of the City Police Act covers a, case of obstructing a thorughfare in any manner and is not limited to obstruction caused by vehicles and animals. There is no reason to suppose that the legislature intended to permit all other kinds of obstruction and punish only obstructions by vehicles or animals. There is a semi-colon before the sentence 'or in any way wilfully obstructs etc.' In the case of obstruction by vehicles and animals there is no question of intention, the act and obstruction caused by the act are sufficient. In other cases intention is necessary to be proved in addition to the obstruction. These are questions of fact to be determined by. the Magistrate. The fact that Act III of. 1889 contains Clause 6 to Section 3 which deals with exposing goods for sale so as to cause obstruction which follows Clause 5 which is similar in terms to clause XI of the City Police Act affords no guide to the interpretation of the City Police Act. Probably the legislature intended to place the matter beyond all doubt.

2. I am of opinion that the accused will be guilty of an offence under clsuse XI of Section 71 of the City Police Act if the requisite intention and the fact of obstruction are proved.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial